268 karma · joined November 26, 2010
It does say "Tell Congress: Please don't censor the web!"
This being said, I was under the impression that funding a project is still a bit of a risk - I'd expect that some projects (like businesses) simply don't work out how they planned - this seems like that type of problem. Of course they should have mentioned the signal problems (and even reached out to see if they could crowd source a solution) but buying in as an early "funder" would imply that there is a risk that it doesn't work, in my opinion.
Seems like they simply couldn't deliver on the project, glad that it's only happened to him once in 72 times.
I read the title and instantly though how cool it would be to do exactly what the article described.
By your logic, If Fox has the superbowl, NBC could sit above an open stadium in a helicopter and broadcast the whole game - I don't think thats the case, but I don't have the laws to back it up.
Regardless, its an awful lot of work which is a) still illegal (therefore risky) b) difficult to market and c) completely obsolete the second the NFL network starts a new TV/online network for it
You got an SLR in, but try "filming" a game with it - you'll be stopped in under 10 minutes, I promise you
Also, that isn't like the streaming sites where you can be at a desk in Sweden and re-broadcasting games fairly anonymously... they'd just walk up to your seat and escort you out.
It's too bad it has to come to that.
This is especially true in the last 30 or 60 days - to the point where you invoice and are paid before the job is done just because it "has" to be in the billing period.
I'm equal to any "power" user, I work on the road and tether daily while using the iPhone for basically everything. I'm still not getting anywhere near 6GB. You'd literally have to use the iPhone connection as your main internet source to get above 6GB. I'm not torrenting or streaming a TON while on my phone, but I watch mobile streamed hockey (they are at 400 kbps) fairly often.
HD video is indeed more then 300kbs - but are my Youtube videos on the iPhone 1080p? Hell no. Even netflix for mobile is severely compressed and still looks OK.
You may use more then 6GB of mobile data a month, but as I said before, I'm willing to bet you're in an extremely small percentage there.
As I said, I literally have streamed entire leafs (NHL) games and had plenty of space left to do normal things. If I'm not mistaken, Youtube data rate is 300kbps, which is 132 MB/hour. So 6GB would give you theoretically 46.5 hours of youtube videos. You're trying to tell me that that isn't "basically unlimited"? Seriously?
Hell, basic wired internet in Canada starts with a 25GB cap. 6GB is more then 99% of people need for mobile.
Novelty, sure, but practical? Not in my mind.
This doesn't end well for ANYONE.
I did the numbers for this exact same thing a few months ago - I was going to set up a white labelled LiveDrive and sell it nationally on Groupon/Groupon clones for "1 year, 80% off full cloud backup storage" etc. Obviously the intention is to get them to keep going after the 1 year since their files are already uploaded. Ultimately, although money was there, it just wasn't a good option. As has been clearly shown here, your entire model is in the hands of LiveDrive, and they are in it to make money, not to make peanuts of you and get hammered with costs.
I don't think this should feature restaurants but rather "things to do", hiking trails, look outs, maybe specific food places (local legends, etc) but specifically things that "make up communities" (I think of like college football towns, etc)
FWIW, they are redesigning their website!
(Oh right, everyone)