839 karma · joined April 30, 2021
Even if you’ve already tried it before, you should give it another chance.
Every one of these changes had the same goal: trading the intelligence users rely on for cheaper or faster outputs. Users adapt to how a model behaves, so sudden shifts without transparency are disorienting.
The timing also undercuts their narrative. The fixes landed right before another change with the same underlying intent rolled out. That looks more like they were just reacting to experiments rather than understanding the underlying user pain.
When people pay hundreds or thousands a month, they expect reliability and clear communication, ideally opt-in. Competitors are right there, and unreliability pushes users straight to them.
All of this points to their priorities not being aligned with their users’.
ChatGPT uninstalls rose by 295%, downloads fell 13% on day one and a further 5% the next day [2].
One-star reviews spiked 775% overnight, then doubled again the following day [2].
1.5 million users joined the QuitGPT boycott within days [1].
Claude rose to #1 most downloaded app in the App Store and US usage rose by 51% [2].
New customers are now choosing Claude over OpenAI 70% of the time [1].
And much more. I think it was just your bubble that didn’t cancel it.
[1] https://letsdatascience.com/blog/altman-called-the-pentagon-...
[2] https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/openai-backlash-pentagon-partnersh...
Just as with politics, the only way to get them to do what’s in our best interest is to make them come to the conclusion that they’ll risk losing money (or status or power) if they don’t.
Those tokens going to other providers are tokens not going to Anthropic, so they want to lock you in with Claude Code. And it clearly works, since a lot of people swear by it.
If you don’t need auto updates, just disable them.
More importantly, notepad++ being able to update itself is not the exploit here. Your OS’ package manager would download the same compromised binary as notepad++’s built in updater.
I really want to switch, but no 1P support makes it really hard, unfortunately.
While the content is different, it’s much cheaper than Tailwind Plus. If you use AI, it may even be more useful than Plus because of the great agent rules and discord community.
People and companies cannot host it and offer it as a service to other people or companies.
Interestingly, it’s the only LLM I’ve seen behave that way. Others simply acknowledge the failure and, after a few hints, eventually get everything working.
Claude just hopes I won’t notice its tricks. It makes me wonder what else it might try to hide when misalignment has more serious consequences.
The model doesn’t have to be powerful to snitch you to the FBI or have a distorted sense of morality and life.
> After visiting an Orb, a biometric verification device, you will receive a World ID.
> For each unique human who verifies their World ID with your Orb, you will earn WLD tokens.
> World Operators are independent local business owners or entrepreneurs who help make World available in their local communities.
> Make a USD $100 deposit to secure your priority for an Orb.
Really going for a full score on the scam checklist.
idk, I expected a bit more risk-taking and creativity given the price and exclusivity.
The population may trust the government now, but totalitarian regimes are returning to fashion and love when they can skip the data collecting bureaucracy and go straight into building or offshoring their gulags.
The UK, US, Australia, and other capitalist flagships are all trying to do the same. Not to mention the Patriot Act.
Let’s say I make a few changes in the code that will require changes or additions to tests. I give the agent the test command I want it to run and the files to read, and let it cycle between running tests and modifying files.
While it’s doing that, I open Slack or do whatever else I need to do.
After a few minutes, I come back, review the agent’s changes, fix anything that needs to be fixed or give it further instructions, and move to the next thing.
We can be mad at both advertisers and what happened here, there’s no need to choose one.
Regardless, research must be done ethically and with full consent. These researchers did neither so they must face consequences.
Does anyone here have experience with it?
Does it mean AI though? Lots of lines in repositories are generated by software that isn’t AI. Dependency lock files, proto files, etc
IMO the wording is intentionally misleading.
This wouldn’t be possible at scale without AI.
Here’s a few results: https://huggingface.co/search/full-text?q=Wikipedia+embeddin...
And the first result, which is probably what you’ll want to use: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Upstash/wikipedia-2024-06-bg...
I recommend you go for pgvector or a similar self hosted solution to calculate the similarities instead of a service like Vector.