I doubt the poster above is against rules, but like me wants to decentralize that authority and enforcement. My answer: you want to have a market for law and enforcement. Read "the machinery of freedom" by David Friedman if interested.
15 karma · joined September 20, 2016
I doubt the poster above is against rules, but like me wants to decentralize that authority and enforcement. My answer: you want to have a market for law and enforcement. Read "the machinery of freedom" by David Friedman if interested.
No, I have no obligation or responsibility to your child. You can ask me for my voluntary help, but that's it.
I generally don't believe in limiting freedoms because people abuse and/or misuse something. There are exceptions of course, but this is clearly not one of them. Should we limit the amount of chocolate sold in stores because obese people lack self-discipline or because parents cannot control their children?
Take responsibility for your family or don't have one at all.
You and people like you are free to avoid pornography if you so choose, but don't try to impose your idiocy on everyone else.
The more probable reason in my eyes is that criminal Hillary is more likely to engage Russia in conflict.
In any case, there are still the negative economic consequence which important alone, but also affect politics.
I think the best indicator would be how people are voting with their feet. Are people fleeing from Venezuela to its neighbors or the other way around?