I'm interested that rivers are such a concern of manual typesetting but I have never heard mention of it in typesetting algorithms.
23 karma · joined December 17, 2013
I'm interested that rivers are such a concern of manual typesetting but I have never heard mention of it in typesetting algorithms.
Threads unlike tasks must be detached if they are too be allowed to outlive their parent.
The key and the message are independently just random data and don't reveal anything about the content of the original message (except it's length).
It is a pretty rare case where we cannot transmit messages securely but we are confident that we can transmit two messages and not have them both intercepted.
If on the other hand you can securely transmit keys that are as big as your data, you could of course just transmit the data itself.
As such this is a starting point in understanding cryptography rather than a practical application.
I think, please tell me if I am missing something
I guess at the end of the video, he will probably reveal what the thing he's been doing is called.
Pour over hot water to just cover, stir until saturated, fill cup, allow to settle, drink.
No need for filters or devices. All the flavour stays in the cup.
Yeah, I'm a bitch.
obfuscation is the name of the game
You wouldn't get away with horrendous babble like this in essay in any subject at any level of education.
Therefore there are two reasonable courses of action to prevent this kind of problem:
* use automatic code indentation
* use a whitespace significant language
The second is absolutely the better choice. You may disagree but you are wrong. This is not a matter of taste, it is a matter of programming language syntax actually reflecting what the programmer reads.I don't want to be successful it sounds stressful. I want to enjoy hacking maths and code.
Wow, this is a wonderful thing.
I would go as far as to say it is the tool every developer wanted and most thought was impossible (the low overhead part at least).
Only recording the nondeterministic parts and replaying the rest is so obvious, once someone else has thought of it.
I can't think of a good argument against it.
That strength is also a weakness though. Particularly because for coffeescript (or my favourite, the related LiveScript) it doesn't result in the super-cute syntax of e.g. TeaCup[1][2].
[1] https://github.com/goodeggs/teacup
[2] Markaby begat CoffeeKup begat CoffeeCup and DryKup which begat Teacup
It's meaning is quite clear.
That's not to say you can't argue that it should be ignored but please have a grown-up argument about it rather than resorting to rhetoric.
However I think even there the idea of setting up a tech company with more than a million euros of illegal currency that can't appear on your books might be a little challenging.