There will still be a non-zero amount of hierarchical order within social systems even if it doesn't come from the government.
1,355 karma · joined March 2, 2017
There will still be a non-zero amount of hierarchical order within social systems even if it doesn't come from the government.
I suppose this all comes back to the point that nobody is pragmatically advocating for absolute anarchy - it's simply a valuable concept to reference as we collaborate to build actual, functioning social systems. Or, at least, that's how I tend to think about it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
~ $ cal apr
cal: year `apr' not in range 1..9999
I agree that this seems positive, but you lose some things with this sort of change as well. ICs often have knowledge of their own performance that their managers don't, even when you're having highly effective 1-on-1s. You definitely don't want engineers spending huge amounts of time and energy selling themselves, but you probably do want them to at least a little bit!
Sure, for a reasonable amount of time until either you are able to be once again, or they let you go.
> Productivity is the company’s problem, not mine.
I know this can feel hard to believe when you're stuck in a crappy situation, but there are many folks who value their output for its own sake.
You might also choose to care about your productivity because it can correspond with your ability to get promoted, earn more, etc.
That said, it's up for debate whether this is a valid expectation either in the context of public services provided by the government, engagements with private parties, or both.
I was wondering whether maybe "no-focus time" might have been something even wackier, like time in which it's explicitly encouraged to interrupt everyone as much as possible, which I know sounds silly, but you never know these days...
https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/owners-equivalent-rent-an...