malmsteen

because you can't work with people who hate you no matter why.

They're firing him not even because of his opinions but because he's just bringing more "bad" than "good to the compagny.

At the end of the day it's not the "compagny taking a moral standpoint" but "solving a compagny problem" in the most simple way

Cute (and harmless) example of "projection" in psychology

how's that passive ?

> Advertising is responsible for the increased monopolization of the economy, inequality, urbanization, over-consumption, greed, depression and many other issues...

yeah screw moderation... let's be extreme all the way

Advertising is not "responsible" of urbanisation.. urbanisation is a fact of life.

"Don't worry, you're going in either way"

Did you get the hidden meaning at that point ?

yeah many of the elders had weird diets. There was always eggs involved also.

Calorie restriction is really interesting

your contribution is appreciated

>> The most likely explanation I've seen floating around, is Trump saw footage of Muslims celebrating the attacks on TV, and mistook those celebrating for being in New Jersey.

Yeah sure...

Yes it's implied, but the point of the sentence is that altman's approach is more effective than graham..

Ad ? What's that ? Oh that thing before "block".

I head about that.. it's a TV stuff no ?

just press escape before it's fully loaded. Works fine with adblock + mublock

Green greenwald a neo-nazi ? What's wrong with you ..?

More simplified summary of the debate :

PG: "Startups create economic inequality. But it looks like they drive the economy and create value. I'll defend Startups so let's say that economic inequality is not a core problem"

Crowd 1: - "OMG ECONOMIC INEQUALITY IS BAD !" - "OMG you defend concentration of power in rich people !" - "OMG your pinterest wall is more important that educating you children, that's what you call value ?!" - "OMG !"

Crowd 2: - "Startups don't create that much economic inequality anyway" - "They don't actually drive the economy either" - "We're not sure they create value" - "Everyone know economic inequality is fine, we should adress poverty"

Elon Musk: - When do we go to Mars guys ??!!!!????

So, i have a very simple question.. :

I want to start deep learning now, to implement RNNs, autoencoders, Q-learning on a very specific application (not images).

I've read a lot of papers, but not done any DL implementations yet (although many classical ML so far), my question is very simple :

Where do I start ????

Should I use Torch ? Theano ? Theano + pylearn2 ? Theano + pylearn + Lasagne ? Caffe ?

Or should I just switch to this magical new library directly ?

I feel confused.. any advice ?

Scholarship ?! Which country are you in ?