176 karma · joined January 28, 2011
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotka%E2%80%93Volterra_equatio...
I tried a few times and I can consistently make Windows miss at least the first keypress if I haven't opened the Start menu in a few minutes.
http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/work/retire/state-pensi...
I'm curious, what do you mean? Having bought from both stores (in Lisbon) I have noticed no difference.
Edit: never mind, I just saw your answer to this comment's sibling.
One thing is to say that a war is unlikely to be started by a woman (your historical observation); another thing is to say that a woman is unlikely to start a war (your claim). That's because, historically, the people in a position to start a war have mostly been men.
If W means that a given leader (i.e., someone who could have started a war if he or she wanted to) was a woman and S means that the leader started a war, by Bayes' theorem the probability of the leader having started a war, given that she was a woman, is
P(S|W) = P(W|S) P(S) / P(W)
Likewise for men (if ~ means negation):
P(S|~W) = P(~W|S) P(S) / P(~W)
You observed that P(W|S) is much smaller than P(~W|S); but to compare P(S|W) and P(S|~W) you also need to take into account how much smaller P(W) is than P(~W).
Something similar ("Needle Park") was attempted in Zurich in the eighties: a place where drug sale and use was officially tolerated. It was closed after a few years. Opinions are mixed.
* lottery A = 0.9 chance of $1000 + feeling somewhat smart and 0.1 chance of 0 + feeling very stupid
more accurate?
In fact, the RU486 is a abortion-inducing pill effective in the first 2 months of pregnancy [1], while "morning after pill" is a common name for emergency contraception pills effective for the first few days after intercourse [2].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mifepristone [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_contraception
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/italy-banning-cash-transact...
If what you want to know is the probability of having the 5 guys paired with 3 men and 2 women (which is what I think the grandfather meant), the answer is
C(4,3) x C(10,2) / C(14,5) = about 9%
(number of ways to pick 3 men out of 4 x number of ways to pick 2 women out of 10 / number of ways to pick 5 people out of 14, /regardless of the order/)
If you want to know the probability of having the pairs made exactly in the order the grandfather mentioned, it's
P(4,3) x P(10,2) / P(14,5) = about 0.9%
(as above, but considering the order)
where C(M,N) and P(M,N) are the number of combinations and permutations of N items out of M, respectively.
(edit to change multiplication symbol, asterisk doesn't show)
But it looks like a plain article class LaTeX document, except that I changed the margins and the font (Palatino instead of Times). If you want a more sophisticated layout you can customize the LaTeX-specific options; they'll be ignored when you export to other formats.