823 karma · joined February 5, 2012
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/maebert; my proof: https://keybase.io/maebert/sigs/_fWYpfCiJKYYsnJitNHUA5yeVQ9O-aLez3Yh6YAmsV4 ]
“Trust me, I’m European”.
In short, I believe we care about too. much. stuff. all. the. time. Ironically, giving less fucks makes us happier if we know how to distribute them well. This app is trying to do exactly that.
https://github.com/maebert/prolog_puzzles/blob/master/readme...
While the flashy part is the “speech synthesis”, the science breakthrough is actually better frames as an machine learning problem.
Imagine you record someone moving their hand across a canvas. The hand movement becomes the input, the drawing the output. The ML problem they solved is to reconstruct the output (or at least something that resembles it) from the input. In the study’s case, that’s efferent motor signals.
There is a long history of mapping these kind of signals in the sensorimotor homunculus to the respective muscles they control downstream (and some really cool stuff like prosthetic limbs can already be controlled with it), but speaking is a notoriously hard motor task and requires a lot of muscles to work in unison in very precise ways. When you implant these multi-electrode arrays, you get a few hundred more or less random single neurons, astrocytes, and local field potentials from the nether in between. Nonsense, noisy data. Being able to map this back to the result they produce in the body is technically as complex as astonishing!
"Chinese hackers cost US economy $100,000 / h"
Well, replace random accusations and numbers by facts of course, but that's a valid question: How many employees can currently not to any meaningful work because they don't have access to what they're supposed to work on? This times salaries spent on them anyway is a good lower bound for the damage done to the economy (actual damage should be higher since employees should of course add more value to the economy than their salary).
Christoph Koch says that 1) Make a really complex system. We can even measure how complex systems are! 2) ??? 3) Consciousness!
By the way, that's not panpsychism, that's emergentism, and for much better accounts of that read CD Broad or Jaekwon Kim.
However the main use for encryption is to store your journal on an insecure medium such as Dropbox, and I believe encryption is still the best way to keep your data from companies you don't trust.
(Then again, after Condoleezza Rice got on the board of Dropbox, I'm not so sure anymore.)
I agree that the * is not perfect. Turns out there aren't so many characters that are accessible on most keyboards (also non-US layouts) that are NOT already special characters on most shells. Suggestions welcome!