342 karma · joined July 18, 2021
I don't see why a 20 YOE candidate with predictable capability has no right to also likewise determine how experienced, qualified or intelligent team members on the interviewing side are...
>That's a law enforcement role in most of the rest of the western world.
Might want to take a step back and realize what they were protesting.
This is impossible for other reasons. When you are feature-developing a product, you will hire tons of employees, and then what do you with them when you are done with the feature development? Fire them? Lay off? When has that ever happened? Bugfixing, even if complicated takes less people than peak scale high growth development and nobody wants to maintain old cruft or refactor anyway. (cough HR cough). I'm willing to bet no company has ever downsized after feature development finished, they either go insolvent after they bolt on the kitchen sink or become IBM.
The real solution seems to be hiring a good, but sustainable sized team that you can maintain perpetually, but that never happens because your competitors will outgrow you if you do that. (Especially salespeople) We don't live in an economy of rational growth, because you'd be living on the streets if you tried to do that.
(Also remember if I'm not wrong GM makes most of its money from financing, it's not a problem unique to the computer software/hardware industry)
They are trustless, that's the biggest advantage.
I'd say yes to that.
>rich conservative voter that emits more greenhouse gas than the F-150 ever can ever hope
Wow