102 karma · joined February 19, 2016
https://www.aarp.org/health/brain-health/info-05-2013/drugs-...
Not saying this is the way to go, just wanted to point out an interesting tidbit.
I found this with a web search just now: https://www.military.com/defensetech/2003/04/15/slippery-sol...
I think some radio shows etc have greater ability to be polarizing with this out of the way, and our respective bubbles freer from outside disturbance.
Is there a connection between their opinion and how they came to be high-ranking?
Is it Java Shop Politics[0] at play?
I find their opinion frustrating.
[0] http://sasamat.xen.prgmr.com/michaelochurch/wp/2012/04/13/ja...
But what I'm saying is the article's suggestion doesn't allow me to see something smaller like a motorcycle with the mirrors, and either I'd have to turn my head even further to see it with the mirrors in suggested position to check that area or -- worse yet -- I can't physically see that spot without the aid of a mirror.
I tried what the link suggests and had many instances where a motorcycle zipped by close to my car -- I didn't notice them until [what would have been] too late because I couldn't see the area next to my car easily that way. Now I have my mirrors adjusted so I can see motorcycles better, and I turn my head to check the remainder.
All humans are legally blind in their peripheral vision just a few degrees off-axis, so I make sure to focus where I claim to be checking.
The start-up failed for many reasons and this was one.
Where do you draw the line between what we can all agree on and where you start to feel coerced into supporting what you call others' personal view of something?
Certain constraints on freedom can actually lead to greater freedoms. As someone mentioned above, there's greater freedom in taking a long break from work or in doing a career change in Norway than there is in the United States.
Are there places where enough people make the moral choice to support as high a standard of living as Norway?
Edit: I mean, it seems you're saying that there are enough good humans to support a nice enough society that we should all have that much free will. But is that what we find in real life?
Edit: https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2009/09/l...