Great idea though.
155 karma · joined September 21, 2012
Great idea though.
I would argue it has everything to do with getting things done, in particular the right things.
Also, why write an article detailing your experiences and then write experience off completely.
"In a poll commissioned by the Digital Advertising Alliance (DAA), 92 percent of 1,000 Americans surveyed agreed that free news, weather, email, blogs and video content was either somewhat or extremely important to the overall value of the Internet."
What kind of category is "somewhat or extremely important" and how is 1000 people of undisclosed circumstances (other than being American) representative of people that use the internet?
The study that is linked from "the majority are not bothered by the static, non-intrusive ads" asks users of Mechanical Turk to look at an ad and rate it on its "annoyingness". Each user was paid 25 cents flat, and 2 cents per ad to a 172 ad maximum - so there's a $3.75 incentive maximum on completing the test will ratings on everything.
How annoying is any ad that you are being paid to stare at? That's missing the point completely.
I don't buy this sentiment that ad-blocking will be the end of the internet. Continued innovation on payment models, and content worth paying for is what we really need.
$60,000 is laughable. The justification based on salaries in California is laughable.
Unless a relocation package to California from anywhere there is internet is included in the fee?
Even then......
>> "Hide had become 'withdrawn'"
Priceless!
This might be the "muso" in your real-world social group or it might be a respected journalist outside that group. It might even be Bono himself.
I'm in a similar age bracket, and I've had "so what are you listening to these days" conversations with friends. I find them quite rewarding, even though my broader tastes have settled down.
I'm biased (obviously) but I think we've built something along the lines of those conversations - and more (check-out maps!).
Sometimes I have to stop myself doing this before conducting interviews. I think it's an ego thing, or perhaps an insecurity. When I worked at Amazon the culture drove this kind of rubbish and skewed our hiring process immensely.
There was something perverse about being in an interview loop, all 8 of us "not inclined" to hire a single candidate because they missed an recursion terminator in a solution to something properly complex and scratched out on a whiteboard in 15 minutes. All of us nodding like "that's so stupid" and I was sitting there 100% certain of the 8 people in the room the 7 of us who hadn't conducted the same interview 50 times would drop a bollock somewhere along the way. Yet there was no way this "otherwise competent, and quite nice guy" was as technically astute as all of us gathered here today indulging in our nice cup of ego massage while other people got actual work done.
Now when I interview candidates I want to see some code you have written you are proud of. Above all, I'm looking for pragmatism, effective reasoning and discipline in execution.
I love the idea of a paid working trial of some length, followed by a permanent hire but I've yet to convince the powers that be that it's an effective strategy.
"...I realize I’m a pretty well-rounded and high-performing developer/engineer/architect. At the scale of Facebook, I’m exactly the sort of engineer I’d want many of...."
In my opinion there are at least three no-hire red flags attached to this statement.
http://www.randomhouse.com/book/176227/antifragile-things-th...
[1] Our prime minister explaining what cloud computing is - "A wireless connection to shared storage" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzaQxLFl3rQ
[2] A senator explaining why the abundance of rain on the west coast of Ireland makes it particularly suitable as a base for, wait for it, _cloud_ technology - https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056460271