606 karma · joined November 14, 2010
2. It talks about tuition, which is a nonsense metric, since private (and to a lesser extent public) colleges offer steep discounts (aid). A meaningful analysis would report on actual payments.
http://www.jgraph.com/mxlicense.html is a non-free license, but https://github.com/jgraph/mxgraph/blob/master/license.txt is non-commercial Creative Commons
Can I get a perpetual commercial license for mxGraph today?
https://www.draw.io/about.html says
"As Pro Plus® ++
Unlimited Users Unlimited Drawings Full Source Code
$0 / diagram / cpu / user / hour"
And how did you get permission to display all those customer logos on your page? -- Fortune 500 usually negotiate compensation for using their logos like that, which a vendor of a free product wouldn't have time/incentive to deal with.
The benefits are neglible, as next-gen RAM, next-gen peripheral bus, etc, all require a next-gen motherboard.
More of a concern is custom-built shopping, where it is harder for a small vendor to stock a batch of mobos and a variety of chips, and some chips go obsolete before sale (and so their mobos would be lost too...)
But hardware is really, really good these days (as the article notes). Runs cooler, less stress, less failure, far overpowered for most use-cases, less need to upgrade.
Enjoy our modern bounty and pay a bit extra for a new mobo every few years.
The same structure drives multi-level marketing, off-shoring/outsourcing manufacturing/recycling/garbage-hauling to sweatshops/polluters/mafia, and the junk mortgage bubble / global financial crisis.
How do any of your analogies work?
Maybe members-only get to see the exciting details of the error?
http://www.emacswiki.org/PlannerMode
It is cool that Sacha maintained it, volunteering is awesome.
I am pointing this correction out because Sacha's primary career is as a self-promotion specialist (http://sachachua.com/blog/), so I have to be skeptical of how her name gets attached to technical work, more so than someone who doesn't pursue celebrity for profit.
People shouldn't think that it's so easy to be famous and a technical contributor. The larger contributors (like John Wiegley in this case) tend to be less famous.
Example: Sure, Linus Torvalds is a celebrity and massive contrbutor, but there are dozens (hundreds?) of other massive Linux kernel contributors who are less famous than, say, Jeff Atwood.
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/dlist/0.4.1/doc/...
It's basically a tree, which is efficient (amortized O(1) per element) for many list appends followed by one iteration.