202 karma · joined July 23, 2022
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_to_Prevent_and_Comb...
While true, I'd avoid making that argument since it implies these restrictions might be worth implementing if they actually did prevent child harm. There is no scenario in which it is acceptable for the government to mandate encryption backdoors, for example.
My company recently configured Slack for mobile to disallow copying text.
Protections he couldn't get for nearly a decade, but did once the law was changed and he was able to do so [1].
>No one made him travel and his passport was revoked before flying to Moscow, evidence elsewhere on the thread. He trapped himself!
He could have (and in hindsight probably should have) stayed in Hong Kong. Regardless, it's unclear when he knew his passport had been revoked. Even if he had known beforehand, he thought he had documents for safe passage to Ecuador.
>Russia is systematically raping and murdering Ukrainians while Snowden is giving his oath to Russia and you call that “awkward optics?”
Please reserve this emotional tripe for Reddit, where it belongs.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/23/edward-snowd...
Just a few tabloid rags like The Washington Post [1], The Guardian [2], and The Atlantic [3].
> That doesn’t mean he has to pledge allegiance during that period. Regardless it’s not what an American patriot does. That narrative is untenable now.
Pledging allegiance is required to obtain Russian citizenship, which grants him additional protections from the United States. It is also required to obtain a Russian passport, which is required because the United States revoked his American passport, made him stateless, trapped him in an adversarial foreign country, and would do everything in their considerable power to intercept him should he try to seek asylum elsewhere.
Sure, the timing makes for awkward optics, but I'm going to cut the guy some slack not only for what he's been through, but for having his reputation falsely tarnished as well.
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/07/02...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/aug/29/julian-assange...
[3] https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/06/wh...
It might have started out that way, but over the years Twitter also added behavioral requirements primarily aimed at undesirables. Most prominent case I can recall is Richard Spencer.
The only thing Secure Boot is doing here is preventing you from loading a driver not blessed by Microsoft. They would happily bless "a driver that can divert all my shit at the kernel level", but it costs too much for the maintainer of WinDivert.