371 karma · joined July 7, 2013
Conceding to law enforcement this way only motivates them to promote policy that allows for further rights violations.
It is, however, and undeniably, expensive.
That is, 'coastal' is irrelevant to your point.
It is expensive. That's different from important.
UPS missed a few packages in an insanely demanding crunch time, and you feel the need to pen an accusatory piece illustrating them as a complete failure?
I ordered all of my Christmas shopping the Saturday evening before Christmas, I got all but one thing, and I am, in fact, quite content with Amazon + UPS's performance.
Seriously, this surprises you?
But the key here is understanding the root cause and showing compassion towards the misguided.
...not constructing an us vs. them mentality, like Greg.
Duration of release? I believe you should leave it on 24/7. IIRC, it's not that nicotine improves sleep quality, but rather that nicotine withdrawal impairs sleep quality rather profoundly, and as such keeping the patch on at night allows for better sleep. I could be wrong here, though. Been a while since I've researched this.
After a quick deep dive on the topic, I found this: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18852035 In short, cells from oral tissues experienced relatively more DNA damage. In absolute terms, it's not much, but reason enough to default to patches, versus oral routes, IMO.
Also, oral nicotine causes all kinds of gingival recession. This is pretty widely known (halfway decent source for this: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2388141).
Vyvanse is d-amphetmine bound to lysine, turning it into a prodrug (which means your gut chemically cleaves off the lysine and, conveniently, you're left with d-amp sitting in your gut).
You'll nearly universally get straight d-amphetamine at the doctor's office.
Reread and realize he's talking about the subjective difference.
How it acts depends on how much is administered.
Best to stick to patches.
There is no such hostility.
Way to generate a conversation around a topic where you provide no hard evidence of any of the claims you're making.
Here's a popular black coder: https://twitter.com/seanlilmateus
Here's a popular woman coder: https://twitter.com/ericasadun
I was simply speaking to the headline of: 'Successful People Start Before They're Ready'
Success is a fine line, people.
I'm not saying you have to take an MBA, but being able to code and being able to manage people are not the same talent. In many situations, they're quite the opposite.
And you had to show off your coding cred before being hired for it. The same should apply for management.
This was such of little consequence, honestly. This wasn't some massive, elaborately planned, misogynistic plot. This was a matter of few pronouns in a random software project.
Stupid crusades like this do damage. We all need to pick our battles carefully. And not doing as much should collectively be viewed as a bad thing.
If you were mounting up on a crusade about this little issue, let me be clear: you should feel bad.
I love tech's progressive thoughts on individual rights and respect and firm adherence to equality, but sometimes the tech industry loses sight of the forest for the trees, and we should collectively rally against that habit.
Now, we lost an amazing Node contributor.
Get back to making world changing products that serve your customers and stop spending time arguing about this stupid shit.
Sincerely,
lolwutf
But, if you subscribe to the 'any press is good press' mentality, I guess it's a win...
But we all owe RMS because he serves as the radical counterbalance to closed source interests.
Maybe he's a little extreme, but he does well with advocating for that end of the FOSS spectrum.
We need a RMS, whether we like him or collectively agree with his opinions.