301 karma · joined November 16, 2014
I think people are doing ES in different ways, and I wish I could hear about the architectures around: what kinds of internal services people have producing and consuming the events, where they process the side effects of the events, where to store the events and also how they are updating the databases used by the applications. I mentioned Kafka because it plays a major role for several implementations, but Kafka is not the whole story neither it is obvious how to deal with it.
About the $35k claim, let's make the math: currently USD 35k ~= BRL 115k. 115k/12 ~= 9.6k. That means USD 35k/year is roughly BRL 9.6k/month, which is the salary of a Senior Java guy here. Idk about 2000, but it seems like you were doing very good back then.
By the way, your YouTube video have no sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PKyKluMcNM
No interview environment will ever simulate "the zone", and there is no way to truly test a programmer out of it.
I used several similar name generators recently and they all sucked each on its own way, but this one rocks.
This clipboard thing remembers me of the webrtc functionality that enable browsers to scan my network without asking me.
Unfortunately, it is very hard to do so in a society that tries to level everyone in the same way.
The best possible situation to me would be working nonstopping for months, then do something else for months and so on.
That said, I was just this week thinking about my next game, a Tower Defense, and now RoboVM dies... :/
Will try the libGDX response as soon as possible.
I generally do not objectively refuse to use something solely based on the technology behind it, but it is an important aspect to consider in the big picture while evaluating the alternatives and the actual necessity of it.
Location: Brazil, São Paulo
Remote: yes
Willing to relocate: yes
Technologies: PHP, JS, Java, Go, C, Lua, SQL, Docker, Elasticsearch, Linux...
Résumé/CV: http://xra.sh/resume
Email: felipe@xra.shReally, really cool initiative.
I still think that the tests, if elaborated by entities fully dedicated to them, could grow to be way more advanced than they are today. But even in the case where this growth does not happen, having separate entities dedicated to perform test-only certification could be beneficial.
By the way, if you still read this: suppose you have student A and student B. Student A attended to all classes, did exercises etc. but failed the tests. Student B missed all classes, but passed every test. Do you think student A should be certified? What about student B? Who would you hire?
In other words, I believe you are right when you point that the educational institutes would narrow their focus to cover only the necessary bits to get certified, but I don't see this getting much far from what we have already; and from the point of view of the certificate emitting institute, it is desirable for the top ones to not emit certificates to anyone (in order to build a valuable brand name), having them to focus on elaborating challenging tests. Of course there may be "certificate mills", but again, this already happens, just with less flexibility.
What really picks me is that, at the end, it is all about the value people give to these certificates. Nothing would prevent society (including employers) to value more the educational process than the testing one; nothing would prevent the educational institutes to also emit certificates, thus coming back to where we are; but employers should not rely purely on certificates anyway, then I believe there is hope for the overall proposed model.
This is what already happens in (at least part of) the technical certificate industry: people pay to make tests and get certified. This seems like a more intelligent approach.