33 karma · joined November 4, 2019
if you look at apple's vertically integrated devices, they chose a cryptography coprocessor that was not on die originally. with a key accessible only by both pieces of silicon's trusted execution environments, rather than the operating system directly, encrypted comms are established in a similar fashion as the TPM2.0 proposal.
this is completely incorrect, encrypted sessions defeat TPM interposers when there is a factory burned-in processor side secret to use. lol at being just "obfuscation" because you can spend $5m to decap and fetch the key then put the processor back into working order for the attack.
that just requires a vertically integrated device instead of a consumer part-swappable PC.
what? why? an LLM produces the next tokens based on the preceding tokens. nothing more. even a harvard student is confused about this?
TPM with no PIN is practically bitlocker with no password. A high entropy PIN happens to solve this entire attack.
Do you work with a lot of software developers with word processing degrees?
Throwing your toys out of the ring because business is business is why open source has a funding problem.