loa_in_

History of invention in the science of mathematics would show that there is nothing that's useless in the long term. It's all pieces of a puzzle.

One can deprioritise health but what does it bring long time? I know it sounds cliche, so I will add that sometimes sacrificing health a little bit is worth pondering.

The kids you mention likely have multiple VR, AR and other gadget setups in their own home. Too much of a good thing is just that.

In a certain Euroland country an analogous delivery company just awards the driver minimum hourly payment on certain agreed before hours if they're clearly working but circumstances had them earn less. Minimum wage requirements stifle nothing.

It's also appears to be a hustle side job employer in PR regarding employment MO, while clearly trying to capture the market for deliveries in weekday work hours.

I think that the best aspect of games or challenges based directly on real life concepts is that the tutorial is the real thing's tutorial. So in this case the man pages and stack overflow.

I thought it was easy: watch videos with your kid, don't allow them to doomscroll or be raised by the "featured"/"front page" algorithms.

How does one make sure the implementation is sufficient and complete? It feels like assuming total knowledge of the world, which is never true. How many false positives and false negatives do we tolerate? How does it impact a person?

It's surprisingly tame still given it interests tens (hundreds?) of millions of people at varying age and background and mostly when the mind is occupied by a problem. I always found it surprising there's not more defacing and toxicity.

There's lots of _marketing_ promising unsupervised agents. It's important to remember not to drink the cool-aid.

The examples are definitely acknowledgement worthy.

I imagine the biggest hurdle on the path towards adopting this is writing down clear, readable prose using highly technical language. And naming things. Using ambiguous human language to describe a complex algorithm without causing a conflict in a big team.

No, these are class based team FPS, core of UT and Quake is (team) deathmatch

So is mine. So what stops a physical process from being simulated in an exact form? What stops the consciousness process from being run on simulated medium rather than physical? Wouldn't that make the abstract perfect artificial mind at least as conscious as a human?

That sounds like picking the most convenient and least painful for the believer option instead of intellectualising the problem at hand.

It almost sounds plausible but it's not. All fuel is extremely heavy elements that in still water falls down and deposits on the bottom.

Think of it as Tenor GIF (a reaction gif provider) but if your prompt isn't there it's AI generated and cached (added) to the global library.

The ingredients are: Anionic active ingredients less than five percent, fragrance, hydrogen peroxide, sodium bicarbonate, acetic acid, preservative - methylchloroisothiazolinone.

I don't see at a glance how it's bleach infused as the packaging claims.

But it's us who wrote current laws, not some magical entity.

I use bleach infused cleaning wipes and I stuff few of them inside each shoe for few nights. I take them out whenever I put on the shoes. On a negative note, it caused some cheaper insoles to literally fall apart overnight while doing this.

Notably, technology is computers and networks but also pumps, presses, gears, everything since the wheel.

Having money allows you to spend time elsewhere, like cherry picking desperate employees. I know temp agencies that have it as the whole business model. If you aren't desperate you don't fit.

But it's not investor fraud if it actually makes the company money and is at least somewhat in the gray area.

People are born every day, the world always runs on the gullible.

Anecdotally, after two years of working indoors every day, when I left my tiny apartment only to walk to the store, I had a career change and I had to see an optometrist who prescribed me glasses and insisted on not ignoring this because it's serious enough. I skipped getting glasses and started working outdoors (a high reach telescopic forklift operator). When changing employers only three months later I once again had to see an optometrist (a different one) and I had half of the myopia I had earlier and no recommendation for glasses.

We're much closer to modelling cells than humans, yet we still pretend like we're already there somehow on both accounts.

To save others confusion, it's not yuml.com but yuml.me, a UML diagramming tool

This is not a useless discussion just because it'll inconvenience someone who is at work anyway.

Wow, that's vile. U have many objections to this but they all boil down to M$ telling you what you cannot do with your own computer.

You are providing the energy by emitting the counter signal in the first place.

Sorting doesn't yield an ELO score for each item. Though tournament is a form of sorting. It's like instrumented sorting.