My non-techie father has been using an Ubuntu 1604 LTS workstation for years with no trouble.
270 karma · joined August 4, 2017
My non-techie father has been using an Ubuntu 1604 LTS workstation for years with no trouble.
I use the android app and it gives me a simple comparison of 4-5 weather forecasts, an "average" forecast, and a "certainty" (a measure of consensus).
Obviously the average of the ensemble averages isn't as good as having the underlying ensembles themselves, but it's nice to see days when the forecasts agree and days when they have no idea!
https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/12/01/vanguards-founder-...
which in turn does
http[s]://boot.netboot.xyz/menu.ipxe
Edit: kayak performs the same.
> We need to adapt. To limit the damage, and fix things.
The first contributes to the second.
They'll think it's normal, which is the real tragedy, but that's been happening for generations already. Your idea of normal is not as rich as your ancestors'. Wasn't North America abundant with wildlife when the Europeans arrived?
Tangential xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1321/
https://puri.sm/posts/purism-librem-laptops-completely-disab...
Things might be different where you are in the world.
Generalisation fallacy 1: "some harmful things are not banned; asbestos is a harmful thing; asbestos should not be banned".
Thankfully most governments are more nuanced with their regulations. In the case of asbestos, since comparable materials exist with less potential for harm, they are favoured and/or the more harmful stuff is banned. Where not possible there can be exemptions, e.g. see my European Commission link earlier, along with the "ban" it says:
> One remaining use of chrysotile has not been banned, however - in diaphragms which are used for electrolysis in certain chlorine plants. This exception is justified because no safe alternative has been developed and this process is carried out on closed sites under strictly controlled conditions.
Generalisation fallacy 2: "asbestos can be dangerous; if handled safely asbestos is not dangerous; asbestos is not a large risk".
Because it can be used safely does not make it generally safe.
Incredibly it's still not generally banned in the USA; only a small list of products are banned by the EPA federally.[0] It was increasingly banned in Europe from the mid 1980s, and totally banned throughout the EU in 2005.[1]
[0] https://www.epa.gov/asbestos/us-federal-bans-asbestos [1] https://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/13445_en.html
> but who knows about it ?
That was big news in Europe, e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-34615621
Interestingly I would be surprised if that stemmed from onerous marketing regulations as suggested above.
> PARTICLE COUNT
> 0-65536 particles / 0.1L
Latin salārium, originally money allowed to Roman soldiers for the purchase of salt, hence, their pay
Not to be confused with the physicist.