I meant it earnestly! If I misunderstood, I have one other guy in here who made the same mistake. Your original comment reads like you’re against the concept of considering unpleasant counterfactuals in general.
33 karma · joined January 22, 2021
To a stationary observer, it would appear as if the time between developments is increasing, and that the field is slowing.
I hope I'm wrong to use this analogy, though. I'd like to continue thinking of myself as relatively informed about technology.
Have you gotten any utility from the data hosted on the-eye.eu? https://the-eye.eu/redarcs/
First they came for the wordcels, and I did not speak out, for I was a shape rotator
what do you mean by this, as it relates to the comment you replied to?