HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

laughingcurve

201 karma · joined July 28, 2016

submissionscomments
laughingcurve··on Forever junior: Skills AI can't develop for you
Criteo is a dogshit company that makes money by tracking you everywhere. the idea of them telling anyone how to skill up or be better is ridiculous.
laughingcurve··on Nvidia announces native GPU programming in Rust
GPGPU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General-purpose_computing_on_g...
laughingcurve··on A misalignment of AI in mathematics
“B-b-b-but muh pop culture trope”

Thank you for commenting this. I'm tired of hearing about Dune like its some kind of utopia

laughingcurve··on Kimi K3: The open-weights escalation
Interconnects is the best place to keep up to date on open weight models because of analysis and discussion like this
laughingcurve··on Nativ: Run frontier open models locally on your Mac
Agreed. Just based on this not being Ollama, so I will give it a try.
laughingcurve··on Claude Sonnet 5
Distillation attacks? Volume of calls?
laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
Dang, I thought I was being harsh I wouldn't say scam but maybe all AI is a scam to some.
laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
In multiple threads now you've claimed I was wrong and then ended the conversation without any assertion, claim, or argument I could rebut. You've ended those conversations with snarky comments clearly designed to shut down debate. This is not how hackernews benefits.

Edit: Nevermind, realized he's just an uneducated troll just looking for his kicks. Comment flagged.

laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
This is a failure to engage the clear arguments and claims made. If you don't want to debate something, why bother commenting at me? Was I supposed to just cede ground and accept your framing wholesale? I'm putting forth very clear and open-to-rebuttal assertions which is what you should do.

Edit: Nevermind, realized he's just an uneducated troll just looking for his kicks. Comment flagged.

laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
Can you explain how 'recursive self-improvement' functions without 'endless benchmark chasing'? I mean, RSI is literally that.

What do you think they're improving on? How would a model self-improve without some metric/data of some kind to check? When you have metrics+data, that is a benchmark. And yes, simulations and or soft-verification like LLM judges are still a kind of benchmarking. Maybe its not a static benchmark they can easily hack.

Folks -- RSI does not mean the self-improvement is them going to therapy and seeking inner peace to overcome trauma.

laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
counter point: https://sakana.ai/asal/

"For the past 300,000 years, Earth has had only one form of advanced intelligence on it: humans. With the recent advent of AI foundation models, some believe we are at the dawn of a new kind of intelligence. As AI continues to evolve, we may witness the proliferation of diverse intelligent lifeforms coexisting with us."

I am not even going to link more than one thing I think I've made my point

laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
It's natural for literally any AI lab to end up doing auto-research, since 'auto-research' is literally just 'autonomous AI' which is the whole darn point of all of this. I'm not going to hand out genius brownie points to folks working on RSI because of course its powerful. How about we hand brownie points to the folks who do things that are not hype and end up being important/powerful?

> was posed specifically under the framing of there needing to be more fundamental research beyond squeezing as much as we can out of relatively vanilla transformer stacks.

Not to be contentious, but this is so broad of a description that it could include literally thousands of papers in the last year or two. I'm imagining double digits or more if we go back the full decade.

I'm saving brownie points for people who deserve them

laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
TRUE
laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
OpenAI is not Sam Altman Anthropic is not Dario Amodei and Sakana is not David Ha

Organizations, especially businesses, are not individuals. If the implication is that David Ha has always been doing this, and will always be doing this, and that Sakana is David Ha ... then that's a far worse insult to the employees at Sakana than my little tweaking.

laughingcurve··on Sakana AI's Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) Lab
I think the most impressive thing about Sakana.ai is their relentless pursuit of whatever is hype right now.

Genuinely it take a lot of work and talent to be this hype-motivated and completely ignore anything except what is popular on X at any given time.

Note: RSI is an incredibly important topic -- I just don't care to listen to Sakana on this matter -- they are the epitome of "hypebeast" https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hypebeast

(Thanks for sharing hardmaru)

laughingcurve··on Different attitudes towards AI in California's university system
Classic NYT
laughingcurve··on Anthropic confidentially submits draft S-1 to the SEC
As a potential PBC founder I am watching this closely for sure
laughingcurve··on I Will Never Use AI to Code
Thanks, helped me save some time
laughingcurve··on Academics Need to Wake Up on AI
As an academic this article was a fantastic position piece. I loved this and enjoyed reading it even if I didn't agree 100% thank you for sharing
laughingcurve··on Silicon Valley is turning scientists into exploited gig workers?
Poor comment. Is it true on hackernews you get people who learned nothing about anything?
laughingcurve··on Costco sued for seeking refunds on tariffs customers paid
Wait are you saying that because the Government lied and blocked corporations from exercising freedom of speech and commerce that therefore the government couldn't possibly be seen to be collecting the funds? Your logic is that if the Government lies we are assumed to have believed it and therefore have no recourse. Most people (not all) are nowhere near as dumb as you seem to think they are.
laughingcurve··on Perplexity Says MCP Sucks
Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made a Great Point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbreaking:_The_Worst_Perso...

laughingcurve··on 2% of ICML papers desk rejected because the authors used LLM in their reviews
Thank goodness we have you passing judgment on the internet; otherwise who else would be around for us to do it? I'm glad you're willing to destroy someone for a mistake rather than letting them learn and change. We all know that arbitrary and harsh punishments solve everything.
laughingcurve··on Nuclear War: An LLM Scenario
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17192

Shall We Play a Game? Language Models for Open-ended Wargames

Wargames are simulations of conflicts in which participants' decisions influence future events. While casual wargaming can be used for entertainment or socialization, serious wargaming is used by experts to explore strategic implications of decision-making and experiential learning. In this paper, we take the position that Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, such as Language Models (LMs), are rapidly approaching human-expert capability for strategic planning -- and will one day surpass it. Military organizations have begun using LMs to provide insights into the consequences of real-world decisions during _open-ended wargames_ which use natural language to convey actions and outcomes. We argue the ability for AI systems to influence large-scale decisions motivates additional research into the safety, interpretability, and explainability of AI in open-ended wargames. To demonstrate, we conduct a scoping literature review with a curated selection of 100 unclassified studies on AI in wargames, and construct a novel ontology of open-endedness using the creativity afforded to players, adjudicators, and the novelty provided to observers. Drawing from this body of work, we distill a set of practical recommendations and critical safety considerations for deploying AI in open-ended wargames across common domains. We conclude by presenting the community with a set of high-impact open research challenges for future work

laughingcurve··on Nuclear War: An LLM Scenario
The quote is "Shall we play a game?”.

“Would you like to play a game?" is from Saw.

laughingcurve··on Number Research Inc
That's Numberwang!
laughingcurve··on Silicon Valley engineers were indicted for allegedly sending secrets to Iran
Eileen Gu, who you are talking about here, is a prime example of the strange issue of misplaced loyalty to a country that is far more abusive than USA
laughingcurve··on Vercel's CEO offers to cover expenses of 'Jmail'
It’s just that simple!

https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2501:_Average_Fam...

laughingcurve··on Qwen-Image-2.0: Professional infographics, exquisite photorealism
Gary Marcus is not the man to be looking to on this topic
laughingcurve··on Hong Kong pro-democracy tycoon Jimmy Lai gets 20 years' jail
you didn’t even link anything specifically just a random lading page that doesn’t mention anything you just claimed
Page 1 of 4Next →