1,275 karma · joined July 12, 2011
Founder and Organizer of Dallas R Users Group. http://www.meetup.com/Dallas-R-Users-Group/
Is this a perfect metaphor? I think its a rigid way of looking at software on either side. I think it is more grey. I like the merits of both sides.
Yet here goes my rant. Nothing can replace a good in-person interaction. Perhaps I'm the old guy in the room. When teams are trying to build something there is nothing like water-cooler talk and banter about the work that helps relate shared challenges. Granted this is going to very specific to organizational needs.
I don't work in software development so perhaps my needs are different than most on Hackernews. I've managed teams in person and remotely. I've found that managing in person is a much more productive way to work.
Space Shuttle never achieved is core objective and project shelved. Space Launch System is way past deadlines and cost. As far as launching systems NASA has not kept up since Apollo.
I would argue NASA has achieved great progress in Space research. Hubble, Voyager, Mars rovers, Webb telescope have made great advances in discovery. I would have NASA change its core objectives to new research activities.
1. Linux is a software ecosystem. Varying flavors and options to fill almost any need of computing solution.
2. Bugs and Regressions are crowd-source community solved. Bugs don't last long if it's keeping something from working.
3. There are so many open-source games native to Linux/Windows/Mac that don't get enough attention. Most of them are free too.
4. Filesharing on linux is as simple as a command line operation. See rsync. Also there are countless GUI apps that use rsync.
5. Funding is everywhere in Linux and open source software. See IBM, RedHat, Google, Microsoft, Amazon among a few.
6. Hardware drivers are plentiful for Linux. Hardly have any issues.
7. The community will help you. They've helped me for years.
https://www.newyorkfed.org/microeconomics/hhdc/background.ht...