1,177 karma · joined April 6, 2016
You should tell the Polish people in 1940s that they should only treat wounds and not fight back.
"But think of the children" that ends with "oh noes the encryption."
Half the time I choose for TOTP authentication over Yubikey because "Oh god it's in the living room I don't want to go get it."
I do have a backup key mind, but that's USB-C instead of A. Maybe I should make another USB A backup.
I've done it in Aegis multiple times. They even allow you to export the 'database' (which iirc is just an encrypted json file)
Will it? At some point it'll be equally (or close to) cheaper as me just building my own *arr stack instead of subscribing to 5 different $20 streaming sites.
>Uncensored results will be used against opensource models questions hovering in dark or grey area
Will they care though? You can use whatever you want against me for pirating x, I'm still doing it.
----
>Limited compute
THAT. That is the point we want to make. For FOSS projects, compute is the single biggest hurdle. Everything else we can make do.
To be fair, IPFS/Torrents/Usenet exists.
No, we cannot, because that isn't practical. any of the nuclear armed countries can launch a nuclear strike tomorrow (hypothetically - but then again, isn't all "omg ai will kill us all" hypothetical, anyway?) - and they absolutely do not need consent of humanity, much less their own citizenry.
This is honestly, not a great argument.
Pass. People should be developing whatever the hell they want unless given a good, concrete reason to not do so. So far everything I've seen is vague handwaving. "Oh no it's gonna kill us all like in ze movies" isn't good enough.
Some of you are set in this idea that an LLM can possibly not be even slightly helpful that you have to trudge through pages of documentation just to look for one slight thing that it'd have told you right away _if_ you wanted it to.
So someone will.
If people (or a team) wants to be in office 2-3 days a week, fine, good for them. If you don't, _you should_ be allowed that choice.
It's easier to just go "hey want to grab lunch?" in office, I'll grant you that, but it by no means is an 'absolute stop' for new hires from socializing with coworkers.
well yes, that's what managers do - make life miserable for others lol. (mostly /s but not really)
Ironically, I think ensuring that people don't starve and become homeless during durations they are unemployed (which unemployment insurance/payments doesn't really do in many locations), is actually a good idea.
It'll be nice to move away from "work because if I miss it we'll be homeless" to "work because I enjoy what I do, and can contribute positively in the field."
>because it promotes a sense of community and networking.
Value is often measured non-arbitrarily. _community_ and _networking_ are both arbitrary.
I keep hearing this while at the same time seeing very little evidence for this.
Most 'water cooler social stuff' is absolutely pointless small talk at best that you have to often engage in to remain polite. I'd rather not if I could avoid it except for certain circumstances with people I am already 'friends' with.
Guess what I do with those coworkers I am friends with? we have a separate channel/group from official channels where we do that already. Nothing's missing there.
I'm going to be a bit blunt but most of management in reality is useless, if not actively harming people under them. 300% of 0 in those cases still remains 0.
Burnt out, trying to get into this. Why do you think lol
This doesn't help.
$700? lol.
Honestly most "rich rich" people I've come across are like that. Most "snobby" rich people are not honestly that rich at all, comparatively, or are very new money etc. (think of "dude who sold their startup for 20 million").
It's not a crime if you both consent.