Feels like a step towards strong arming them into shipping products that can be supported easier/not being left to rot in a drawer.
292 karma · joined August 28, 2014
Feels like a step towards strong arming them into shipping products that can be supported easier/not being left to rot in a drawer.
I’m going to guess that our MP’s are tech illiterate enough as it is, that when an opaque term like “what is a category 1” came up, someone hand waved over it and said “think Facebook or Twitter”
> What makes this powerful is that these aren’t just type definitions - they’re live, reactive objects that sync automatically.
Is what twigged my AI radar too. LLM’s seem to really love that summarisation pattern of `{X is/isn’t just Y. Pithy concluding remark}`
I can’t say I recognise any of these issues from freer, polysemy, nor bluefin.
Wasn’t even prospective, preventative action. There was pretty rash series of decapitations/fatalities in the past decade of people who think sticking their head out of a moving train is risk free that lead to this ruling being made mandatory.
They kicked off claiming it would ruin the ambience, but really it cost a very pretty penny.
They’d do anything to save a few quid; it’s amazing how they used to get cheap oil lube and coal from Russia, and since the war they’ve miraculously been managing to procure the same rates from new companies that have appeared overnight/moved production to sanction-less countries just over the border like Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan etc.
They certainly wouldn’t be your only venture, more “you have a lot of money and love trains” but seats on these things can run for £2k a head and they run basically every day from Spring through to end of Summer.
I can see where they’re coming from, but they certainly haven’t set the stage for it to be a something you could deduce without already knowing what they’re referencing.
So to me, it seems they’re referencing the Free Monad, recursion schemes and a little of HomFunctor/Yoneda Lemma.
The free monad gives a coproduct of functions, where the value is either a recursive call or a value (branch vs node). To get from a set to a free monad, you need to define a Functor over the set, and given most things are representable, this is trivial.
Given this free monad, an algebra can be formed over it by providing a catamorphism, where the binary function would indeed be composition.
Yep. Truly a mystery.
It’s been way more of use to me in pulling together parts of topology, linear algebra, geometric algebra, homology et al than discovering furtive programming abstractions.
Time went on and it got worse and worse. Even non-academic, fun became a chore. Making music, playing games, going out; thinking about them became this litany of choices and todos I’d spiral down and I’d end up just sat there. Wasting time. But thinking how I could be enjoying myself, but unable to break myself labouring in thought of the gravity of execution needed.
I got diagnosed last year, and a year ago on Thursday, at 31, started Elvanse. I can’t for a second understate how much my life has changed for the better. Not only can I now do the boring stuff that life needs (who knew mechanical engineers did so much dull paperwork and standards), the fun stuff came back too.
I have no doubt that even if the rat race didn’t exist, if we lived in some languorous, indulgent utopia where we could do as we please every second, that I would be in bed. Miserable and crippled with option paralysis.
It’s so one dimensional and offensive to whittle ADHD down to “everyone has a lack of focus, they need to do something else”. I don’t see any difference between that statement and saying “depression doesn’t exist, just be happy”.
We made that mistake with social media, not taking it seriously enough. I can wait a hot minute for my iPhone to summarise paragraphs whilst we try and avoid rampant, democracy breaking technology 2.0.
Just can’t put my finger on why they didn’t make me feel better, you know.
https://www.glidermag.com/ <- this works.
Off topic, and if I may be so bold, check out Whitelands. They’re my friends band and they just toured with Slowdive, one to watch out for! (I am 100% biased though).
I’d never considered how the inevitable dystopia would sound, and it’s worse than I ever dared to fear
I’ve played it basically every year since release, it scratches an itch that no other Final Fantasy does. It’s very marmite but it’s far, far from bad at all.
Not noticed a single other thing, I’ve been super impressed with parity between the platforms in fact.
We don’t put that complaining into action though. A nation of boiling frogs.
And that’ll get you infinite journeys from zone 1-6, (£14.90 daily cap for that distance with oyster).
That same journey by car, if we count fuel (average of 52mpg and 162p per litre of diesel) - it’ll cost you ~£5 each way from Epping to Tottenham Court Road.
So £25/potentially £37.50 with ULEZ vs £14.90. And then I hope you have parking space paid for you in zone 1…
It came to pass that MP’s realised they couldn’t do that… yet. So what has actually gone in is some vague wording on “should the technology become available you’ll have to implement it”.
Now most people are taking that as a win, that the wording is admitting defeat. Surely you can’t circumvent privacy whilst maintaining freedoms, you may as well put in “when 1+1=3”. And the companies are saying that’s fine, it doesn’t affect us.
But you can’t help but feel pessimistic. That clause is Chekhov’s gun, it’s put in there in its nebulous state exactly to be vague. I’ve no doubt in the coming years there’ll be a consensus where “the technology is available” comes down to MITM or something.
I’ve always steered clear as they seem to publish anything, regardless of quality.