ladyanita22

This is something I've been fantasizing about for long.

Let's say we took Rust, a language that makes parallelization easier than others (as it helps you avoid some common footguns). How difficult would it be to have a massively parallel computer system made out of many tiny, simple microcontroller-like chips? Let's say we picked many little Risc-V's. Surely this would be an interesting experiment (though I'm not sure whether it'd make economic sense or not...)

So smaller penises are rewarded with higher salaries?

It is a choice indeed. Well worded.

Yeah, this is what always surprises me with modern software targeted towards low-specced computers.

Windows XP run fine in 256MB ram computers yet it could be altered to make it look fantastic, with the Royale or Royale Noir themes.

I guess even Linux back then could be made beautiful on similarly specced computers. Yet, AntiX or even LxQt is hideous despite consuming more resources!

I believe there were some efforts to port Rust to the Nintendo Switch as well.

But you can still sideload them, right?

How does saccharin held in this case?

Qt or GTK

Me as well. Never had any of those issues.

Oh, who cares about that?

I will pluralize as all of them port some drivers from Linux

BSDs and other Open Source OSes that rely on Linux drivers.

Windows probably has not many (or any) drivers ported from Linux.

I think this is true. But that'd be nonetheless up to the subsystem maintainers.

Rust has UB overflow as well, just unsafe.

https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/intrinsics/fn.unchecked_add.ht...

Apple's resistance to rust is truly mind-boggling

That's super cool! I have been wondering what could be done with ESP32 if it weren't for the lack of RAM.

As a fun of Rust, one thing that saddens me is knowing these things would be difficult to achieve with a Rust compiler, given the language seems to be vastly more complex.

Unless someone created a subset of Rust without (some?) safety checks, I guess.

LLVM is also free

I have the feeling that H265 is more prevalent than VP9

He is not like the others

Which distro supports partial upgrades? AFAIK no major distro supports it.

The only difference between Arch and any other regular distro is simply that in Arch there are no major upgrade versions, so any breaking changes you have to perform them manually. Period.

In the rest, they do it for you. But they update key components as well and/or stop getting updated at some point (same as not updating Arch).

For example, I am a happy Fedora user, but I don't get why they don't upgrade the Plasma or Gnome version in the same release but they do upgrade the kernel, when the kernel update may bring more breaking changes...

Also rust, c++

A PPA is suspicious of hosting ransomware.

FreeFileSync's Flathub flatpak, still live, has been mentioned in another subreddit to have had contributions from the same username that was promoting this PPA on Github (3ddruck12). He has been banned from Github.

Is this equivalent to --ffast-math?

Because of the compiler's memory consumption?

Would be nice to have a Rust compiler as well

Not ring 0, though.

> The only real improvement over MS's version is keeping the data local, which ain't much, really.

That's already a lot.

The benchmarks tell otherwise

Redox is shaping up to be the most advanced OSS alternative to Linux apart from BSDs.

Didn't know these run Linux