Poverty poof gone. Hunger poof gone and so on...
Reality gets in the way, of course, just as it does with GW.
2 karma · joined January 6, 2010
Poverty poof gone. Hunger poof gone and so on...
Reality gets in the way, of course, just as it does with GW.
These devices will eventually just become extensions of our ourselves as with other tools.
The Samurai didn't need to think about the inter-workings of his sword to make mincemeat of his enemies in battle.
Through training, the sword becomes a natural extension of one's self.
Why should our hand held computers be any different?
I totally agree with this position. There are numerous benefits to developing better clean air/water standards.
The climate "work" has been on going for decades. The science supporting the theory of anthropogenic global warming is sound.
Their may be some "believers" when it comes to global warming that just take at face value. I'm more of an accepting skeptic. I was skeptical at first that we could 1) Change our climate 2) Predict climate change with any amount of reasonable certainty. Once you understand the science you can see why its obviously true.
I would observe what the local animals seem to be eating.
Another trick is to take a sample and rub a bit of it on of your skin. If it causes irritation, its probably bad.
This quote is taken from the wiki article on Gary Taubes
"Although Taubes has no formal training in nutrition or medicine, his book was praised as "raising interesting and valuable points" by Dr. Andrew Weil, while Dr. Mehmet Oz and trainer Jillian Michaels who appeared on the same program disagreed with Taubes on many questions. [6]"
I think we have to question the science when he states that exercise is an inefficient tool for weight loss.
Taubes is against refined carbs (OK, that does make sense) but is a bit of a nutter on other causes and solutions to obesity.
Of course, I wouldn't expect a lot of people on HN to agree, thus the down-votes.
A lot of the food industry is based on pumping the salt, sugar and fat so that we eat/buy more. So people focused on making money are more likely to side with Taubes (even if he's wrong) than with Kessler.
If I could down vote this thread, I would.
Fast food makes it cheap and easy to get into a pattern where a significant portion of your daily intake is essentially a combination of sugar (soda, coffee, tea, etc), fat (burgers, fries, tacos, etc) and salt (flavoring, preservatives, etc.)
If we went back to the diet before there was fast-food then we'd have a lot less obesity. People would be eating more whole grains, fruits, veggies, fish and lean meat.
edit: Don't get me wrong. I agree with Dawkins on this.
The idea that there is a single perfect language for doing everything is a myth. We need a variety of languages in our toolkit. They can be improved if there is constructive criticism, someone to listen and innovate changes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome
lol j/k
People that are buying the high-end systems are usually people who play PC games competitively. Intel is also making compilers that are optimized for their processors. In addition they are creating tools for optimizing parallel processing. I don't see AMD doing that. If they don't they won't be able to compete in the high-end desktop market.