1,161 karma · joined August 29, 2014
Good conversation! Great pushback against my arguments. That’s what I signed on with hacker news and missing that spirit recently
Concept is fine to me and I believe we should optimize, but a repo that will handle all tools sounds like Sisyphus rolling a rock up the hill.
My take is that handling so many versions and so many different tools shouldn't be the work of any single repo. The responsibility should be either on coding agent to compress or best case scenario people who are responsible for cli tool
and it stands for Rust Token Killer
So do you think rtk cli is ai slop? I had some suspicions looking at their repo and number of issues and their style. The prettier issue with running successfully while binary wasn't even installed was quite entertaining
What do you mean by aggresive context management with subagents? Would you add a lopp that would trim the context?
Both of those tasks seem even more difficult
People often miss the difference between simple and easy. Yes, Ruby is easy, but it's not simple, and it will make you suffer a lot if you get to a complex app. The debugging sessions in Rails are a nightmare. Meanwhile Ruby community is acting like religion, it's almost impossible to convert people from Ruby to other languages, they don't see the language as tool, but as part of their identity
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gergelyorosz_figma-is-going-p...
Figma stack is: > plain Ruby, plus Sinatra and ActiveRecord
Full article about their stack. It’s not rails. https://open.substack.com/pub/pragmaticengineer/p/inside-fig...
I couldn’t believe before with all fearmongering being marketing, but I am coming to conclusion it is. It’s hard to get any signal over noise in attention economy. They know what they are doing and it’s Deja Vu of crypto, but now we are targets with rage baits, guerilla marketing, buzz