kylecarbs

I just put an HTTP proxy in front of Claude Code.

Surprisingly, it just accesses their `/v1/messages` endpoint - nothing hidden at all.

It was inactive for a long time [1]. I emailed GitHub about it and they gave it to us!

[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20201108093051/https://github.co...

At Coder we’re fans and users of Tailscale, so very happy to have these changes be consumed upstream as well!

Founder of Coder here. Many small (or teams at big) companies use Coder for free with <=150 devs just using our open-source.

We’ve tried to align our pricing with the value of the product. In small teams the productivity gains seem to be much lower, so we target Enterprise!

I was able to try it (without being approved) here: https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/

They aren't at all (creator of code-server here)! I'm a big fan of their work.

co-founder of Coder (the company behind code-server) here…

We found that the biggest inhibitor to remote development was the lack of environmental flexibility. For example, Codespaces confines you to an ephemeral Linux container running on Azure, and our old product confined users to semi-stateful Kubernetes pods.

With coder/coder, you can use any operating system on any kind of compute on any cloud and change every single configuration knob. You can also mix and match cloud resources. An early user has hundreds of cloud resources in each workspace, including IAM roles, secrets, and network rules.

Early users are running stateful VMs running on GCP, Docker containers on big servers, Kubernetes Pods, and Windows VMs on Azure. We’re stoked to watch people adopt remote development in their own ways.

Happy to hear! Let us know if you have any issues (co-founder of coder.com here).

Kinda like how Microsoft took "code"?

Creator of the original https://github.com/coder/code-server and co-founder of https://coder.com here. Microsoft’s code-server uses their official extension marketplace, allowing LiveShare, Pylance, and other proprietary extensions in their browser VS Code experience. Their license prevents users from “hosting it as a service” meaning you can’t productize their code-server like you can ours.

We’re disappointed that Microsoft chose to release under the `code-server` command-line name. Our community has produced countless blog posts, videos, StackOverflow questions, etc. that will become difficult for our users to find. This naming decision suggests that Microsoft aims to replace our code-server instead of coexisting.

We will continue developing our code-server until Microsoft’s has parity. As for Coder, we’re focusing more on the platform side (https://github.com/coder/coder) and less on making IDEs work remotely.