https://m17project.org/ https://openrtx.org/#/ https://freedv.org/
These are a few projects that I personally think embody this well.
31 karma · joined April 12, 2019
https://m17project.org/ https://openrtx.org/#/ https://freedv.org/
These are a few projects that I personally think embody this well.
I did this with my (mostly) OpenWrt-based network: https://github.com/kwesthaus/network-config.
I chose the NanoPi R4S instead of the R6S as my router since it is fully supported by vanilla OpenWrt [1] whereas the R6S is still in the works [2].
[1]: https://openwrt.org/toh/friendlyarm/nanopi_r4s_v1
[2]: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/nanopi-r6s-a-rockchip-rk3588s-ro...
[0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/wiki/identity_theft...
[1]: https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_consumer-...
Will do, I've been a little lax the past few weeks but my school semester just finished so now I should have more time again.
I liked working with it so now I'm the package maintainer for it on AUR [2]. At some point I'd like to make a repo showing how to implement common graph algorithms with the python bindings, since GraphQL+- currently only supports k-shortest path at the query level [3].
[1] https://tinkerpop.apache.org/gremlin.html [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dgraph-bin/ , https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dgraph-git/ [3] https://discuss.dgraph.io/t/how-about-doing-some-graph-compu...
I think this also has to do with the fact that Zoom is being used for work and school and therefore people have less choice over their use of it. It's not a social network that many people have chosen to start using, it's a piece of software that millions of students and other people are being required to use without consideration of privacy.
[0]: https://advent2019.overthewire.org/challenge-zero [1]: https://wiki.osdev.org/Bochs [2]: https://twitter.com/David3141593/status/1210363683815272448
I disagree with this sentiment, and upon reflection of why, it seems we've come to a real-life example of the trolly problem. Choosing to be passive and "let the system sort itself out" will almost certainly result in more deaths (edit: specifically in terms of mass shootings), but choosing to be active means the powers that be are forced to make subjective choices. I personally believe that it's worth taking on the responsibility of subjective choice.
Edit: However, I also realize that censorship oftentimes just ostracizes already-radical groups. This has the advantage of making it harder for them to find an audience, but also allows them to radicalize further while under less scrutiny, which also seems like a complicated balance to me.