15 karma · joined December 15, 2020
You don’t have to be as good at coding as a Software Engineer, but I’d say if you brushed up on a language (Python or Go) enough to be comfortable, finding those jobs shouldn’t be hard at all.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/operatorguide/anti... https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/operating-lambda-anti-p...
Robinhood reminded me of Theranos in that they are ran as tech companies that don't take the usual responsibilities of their respective industries seriously. And their outages make me think they don't take their tech seriously either.
I’m currently checking out YouTube Music. The deal is quite good, since it comes with YouTube Premium. In my experience the algorithm feels better, and you tend not to wind up on less “meh” recommendations.
First, the same warning you are referring to also says, exactly: “You can change the storage class without making a new copy of the object using a lifecycle rule.”
Second, to answer your prompt, the reason why the object is duplicated during a storage class change is because S3 is an object store and not a filesystem like you may assume. Performing a modification operation on an object does not change the object itself; instead a copy is made with modifications. When changing storage class, a copy is thus made. If you had used the lifecycle rule as the warning suggested, it would have performed your assumption: make the copy and delete the original object in the background.
P.S. Not trying to be abrasive :) I do though think you should considering hiring a real devops/cloud/sysadmin to manage AWS for you. If that is really not feasible for you, I suggest at the very least looking into setting up budget anomaly detection and alerting. You then might be able to have some visibility into your budget.
I find this comment baseless and insensitive to those that were killed. The Texas accident was attributed to a failure of road ice management. Bystander video clearly shows vehicles attempting to stop sliding for hundreds of yards on ice.
If you're investing for a decades-away retirement, it's always fine to jump in at any time. My allocation is simple: 100% total international stock (I used to be 50/50 US/international but I'm accounting for US CAPE right now). I only plan to diversify out of stocks in the far future. I am diversifying across time.
That said, I also wish I could just turn off AMP (I try to avoid most news) and the QA thing.
I was so disgusted that I still remember this was when my perception of Amazon changed. It wasn’t the last time I would be disappointed by item quality. I still use Amazon, but mostly for consumables these days.