No deepness needed, the only thing you need to know is recursion.
Also SQL is even better than that because every query is it's own statement, so the parsing is dead simple. I totally get why he did it this way.
21 karma · joined September 26, 2022
No deepness needed, the only thing you need to know is recursion.
Also SQL is even better than that because every query is it's own statement, so the parsing is dead simple. I totally get why he did it this way.
I guess the double irony is lost on people.
Will work better on it for next time.
Flies away
Becuase he's with "the message" seeee?
Because he's all about that "effective altruism" seeee?
Because most crypto users are alt-right or republican idiots seeee?
yes laying bricks in a long straight line is automated. Laying bricks in more intricate ways would take a lot more time. Also the machine still has to have human super vision and they seem to clean the mortar.
It's nuanced
doctor
bricklayer
programmer
Reasons all the same: difficult to automate with AI due to non-repeating nature of work. However repeating parts will be automated, hence GP likely to be a bot, also things like co-pilot will replace most web-devs. also houses can be mass built in container-like pods and stacked. so this is very nuanced. check-mate cheeky comment section.
will not survive:
retail worker non-luxury goods
delivery driver in cities with regular grid-like streets aka most of the US
truck drivers between cities
Twitter content moderator
Reasons all the same: easy to automate with AI due to repeating nature of work.
I think the common theme is that if you want something nice like seeing a human doctor, some personlised service, or a nice brick house you are going to see a human. But this will cost tremenduously. So rich people will interact with humans for most services/products while poor people will be interacting with bots. It's already happening (auto-bot callcentre helplines). Overall very distopian.
Please write less pompously and more to the point.
he is a fraud
a 5 year treasury bond right now has a yield of 4%. if you were to buy and hold to maturity, after 5 years you get 4% return. this is what is meant by "outperforms" in this context. If it was about the past, one wouled add -ed and give the start date.
now, docusign stock price is 62% down ytd (2022.10.01), and is only trading 7% over its ipo price. So I don't care what the IRR is, I predict a 4% increase from the current price in 5 years is highly unlikely and the downward move will deepen across the tech sector hence I will never buy this meme stock. I will check in 5 years to verify if my prediction is correct. you are more than welcome to waste your money on this, just maybe don't bet your house on it.
now that a 5 year bond outperforms most tech companies they are beginning to rethink their headcounts and all that sales and marketing spending