krismatja

Interesting that Jane Street has taken an interest in TUIs, I think mostly this renaissance is partly due to the current bloat of Electron GUIs.

There are other great examples of TUIs that i've seen around the web:

https://github.com/ratatui/awesome-ratatui

https://terminaltrove.com/explore/

https://github.com/rothgar/awesome-tuis

But I think we will swing back to using GUIs when we find a performant way of making them, I don't know what it is yet but surely someone is working on this.

TUIs look good to look at though!

Not extensive enough.

I expect a very curious individual such as yourself to make the same or if not higher level of analysis as the one on Adrian Dittmann for roon.

All of this information without their consent, including their close family and friends, children and other information about where they live, their private information floating on the internet and who they work and their work history (all blurred out of course).

Then we can definitely conclude that roon is or is not Altman, we both know that roon and Altman work at OpenAI so you can start your investigation there.

The same of what you said to me can be also applied to the "roon (@tszzl)" account on X, it has been widely speculated that that account is Sam Altman, works at OpenAI, knows about 'AGI', and also speaks in riddles.

Now that we know 'the truth' that Adrian Dittman is not Elon (it was an elaborate inside joke by the way)

Should we both together make a large extensive public exposé on the roon (@tszzl) X account to find out the truth because we are curious about what the fuck is going on?

Thank goodness for that, I hope people will now believe that I am Elon as well.

It's time to admit it, I'm Elon Musk. This certainly not a joke here and not sarcastic at all.

Please believe me.

Woosh.

> It’s in the public interest because Musk is one of the most powerful people on the planet and he’s exercising that power quite forcefully these days.

But that doesn't mean you should go ahead and hunt for every detail about a person just because they sound like Elon.

So if I am a great Elon Musk impersonator should I be doxxed to a huge extent just like in this article / Spectator?

All one had to was ask or do a face interview with the person.

Even if this person is Elon or not, who cares really?

I don't know about you, but this is extremely creepy and overly excessive to get information on a private individual without consent, just because he has a similar voice to Elon.

Especially when this all of this was based of a joke it seems?

This is directed at both this article and the Spectator.

Should we do an in-depth and detailed documentation on the 'roon (@tszzl)' X account next?