2,131 karma · joined September 5, 2013
Promoting conspiracy theories about satanic rituals, pizzagate, the seth rich lies, and clinton-organized child kidnappings is not in any way exposing something resembling truth. They promoted conspiracy theories criticizing that the Panama Papers release was a George Soros-funded conspiracy to target Russia and the former USSR.
None of these claims had evidence attached to them. Leaks of truth are valuable, but I have lost all faith that wikileaks publishes in a non-partisan "truth for truth's sake" mission, rather, I think they have specific targets in mind and publish whatever it takes to harm those targets and help others.
And Atom does it without Microsoft.
Seriously though, what kind of comment is that? Facebook develops open source plugins for the atom ecosystem, and somehow that's supposed to be the most important criticism?
I'm totally open to being convinced, but I'm skeptical right now that they are in fact that shady. I'm more inclined to believe that it's a placebo effect from suspicious people suddenly paying more attention to ratings after a sales call, and also attributing any negative dip in rating to the phone call they recently had. There are also third-party groups who call claiming to be able to list your business higher or rate it better, and I'm suspicious that some people confound these callers as yelp representatives.
And linked from elsewhere in the thread: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-yelp-ratings-20140905-... -- it just seems like with no scientific study backing the claims and case after case being lost, I think the onus of proof is on the people accusing yelp of these threats.
320kbit CBR MP3s were... I'd say, generally OK if you did not plan on skewing their tempo much outside of a very small range (give or take 5% speed). Really bad artifacting becomes audible quickly beyond that range. Maybe it was placebo, but I also found differences between FLAC and 320kbit MP3 discernible when working on big, more powerful speakers.
But, with FLAC, it didn't matter if the sound was played at 10% tempo or extreme amplitude, audio was always crisp, clear, and free of compression artifacts (obviously).
On my laptop speakers or earbuds, no way would I be able to tell the difference between any of these today.
I can't disagree more. It just seems like clients would have a nightmare of a time debugging client-side code against such a system.
Interestingly enough, the older version 45 has 6.08% share. Is some operating system pinning chrome 45 and perhaps providing security updates?
I'm also not convinced the feature set is identical. Atom comes with a lot of language support, customization options, and extensibility out of the box.
Simple answer: Plugins. It'll be the same answer every time this question is asked, for me.
As someone who doesn't see using typescript in the foreseeable future, and doesn't feel impacted by performance benchmark comparisons, VSCode doesn't seem to offer me any compelling reason to switch to it and go through reconfiguring another editor.