It's not instruct tuned looks like? It's closer to a base model rather than a chatbot.
4,604 karma · joined July 6, 2015
Then why was it allowed as an option in the millennium prize statement?
I think that implies mv3 does support it. Seeing as it can inject scripts, I don't see why it wouldn't be able to.
Why does this spill over? Unlike CPU which is multiplexed by the kernel's scheduler (so infinite loops can't lock out other programs), is the GPU not multiplexed in the same fashion?
Given that we have self-driving cars, isn't this easier if someone really wanted? I guess compared to cars the marginal savings is not worth it though.
You can still navigate by path via cmd+shift+g (this works in the file picker too), but I feel like the popup animation used to be a lot quicker on older versions. You can customize views, but to get them to actually stick you have to use an arcane incantation (delete all existing ds_store, then go to view options menu and hit "make default").
You can cut-paste but you have to use cmd+c and cmd+option+v instead of cmd+x. There is an option to merge, it only appears under conditions: only when copy/pasting and only when "alt" is held in the dialog I think.
It also is really bad at browsing networked volumes, partly due to poor defaults as it tries to litter ds_store and generate thumbnails.
Opening a new tab always takes you back to the root directory instead of cloning your existing view. All of it is stuff that could be added in a simple point update rather than a ground-up rewrite.
The "all chromium versions" part of the title is also misleading, most browser CVEs do not distinguish between "untested lower bound" vs "affects all" (even though it seems like it'd be trivial to bisect).
https://www.speechpad.com/blog/ada-compliant-captions-vs-aut...
If you have a risk of getting sued because someone notices a transcription error versus just not uploading videos, people will choose the latter.
That's a bit of an overstatement? There's a list of things that you _can_ call, and fairly useful ones too like `write`
Or equivalently could have gone down as a "deepseek" moment in TTS if the model was open-sourced (I don't think even a paper was published). It's a bit strange, he never made any profit but also never ended up publishing anything even after it was shut down.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/dogs-poop-in-alignment-...
but then again maybe not
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S15587...
I think in this case it doesn't help that there are multiple watermarking schemes, and the easiest for people to understand is the red/green scheme by Kirchenbauer et al. (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.10226), which does technically distort the logits (but I'd argue only in cases where you wouldn't notice it anyway).
I wasn't aware of this gumbel softmax scheme, it seems you're referring to https://simons.berkeley.edu/talks/scott-aaronson-ut-austin-o... ? That's really clever as it doesn't even distort the logits, basically cryptographically indistinguishable from a "real" random sample unless you have the key.
The actual scheme Claude uses seems to be neither of those two though, they say it is SynthId-text which seems to be tournament sampling based.