Obviously you give the reference a coding test
122 karma · joined February 11, 2020
2) Why would a job be necessary to have something to challenge/strive for?
Either you don't have many questions or you're content with answers that are sufficient rather than sufficient and necessary.
"B if A" or "If A, then B" interpreted as
A -> B
The fallacy would then be to do the following
A -> B
B
------------
A
On the other hand, iff is interpreted as A <=> B
i.e. A -> B and B -> A
So you can get A or B if you have B or A respectively.
Doing a unit conversion doesn't change anything. The limited supply argument is not implying that you won't be able to own fractional bitcoins, it's arguing that the amount of bitcoin you do own with always be a fixed proportion of the total possible supply (in reality it's proportion will grow as people lose access to their keys) so it won't get devalued by the total possible supply increasing. Remember, value is relative to the supply. Looking at your bitcoin in terms of satoshis doesn't change it's value.
You're doing the same thing here as you did above with your original post.
No anti-racist would look at the results of IQ tests and frame their conclusion as "don'tcha see, black people are stupid".
No anti-racist would look at the article you posted which acknowledges that "the use of corporal punishment in black communities today is a byproduct of centuries of slavery, the racial terrorism of the Jim Crow era, and exposure to racism that continues to chip away at the vitality of black life." and come to the conclusion that "black parents just need to learn what white parents have learned".
Everyone can hear the dog-whistles loud and clear.