Considering that they are supporting Linux, there was no real reason to make it so Linux-specific that all other Unix-like systems got excluded.
719 karma · joined March 7, 2020
Considering that they are supporting Linux, there was no real reason to make it so Linux-specific that all other Unix-like systems got excluded.
I think moving from Make in the old version of IDF to CMake was a mistake.
Thanks for sharing the resources! Great to connect with fellow e-paper enthusiasts :)
This project of mine is similar to what you described with a power down mode. The power down and wake up can be automated. I'm looking to build a small business around such projects. Not sure how viable it is.
Looking at the summary section, I'm not convinced these guys learned the right lesson yet.
My own humble e-paper projects:
https://www.asciimx.com/projects/e-reader/ https://www.asciimx.com/projects/etlas/
Once I had to look up a research paper to implement a computational geometry algorithm because I couldn't find it any of the typical Web sources. There were also no library to use with a license for our commercial use.
I'm not against use of "AI". But this increasing refusal of those who aspire to work in specialist domains like software development to systematically learn things is not great. That's just compounding on an already diminished capacity to process information skillfully.
1. Power management may not be as good as with Linux
2. No HDMI sound support
3. No bluetooth
4. You need to be comfortable with config files and man pages.
5. Probably fewer applications in the ports tree (I have all I need).
If you are fine with the above, OpenBSD is the finest OS I've used so far. I've never run into random issues like wifi connectivity, audio issues like with Linux.OpenBSD Xenocara
I guess modern apps were developed against those APIs that they've become a necessity now?
I understand rebase vs merge invokes strong feelings (including in myself), which is exactly why imposing them on others is extremely annoying. Perhaps we just do as we like, but don't presume to know better than everyone else?
Git workflows imposed by those that don't understand git well enough is one of the most annoying things.
Why is tail recursion better generally? I'm not familiar with FP very much, but it feels like loops more closely resemble the way computers execute them than tail recursion.
We do not need Android, iOS, Mac "protections" here. We don't need overlords to protect us.