123 karma · joined November 8, 2007
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=1
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=2
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=3
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=4
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=5
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=6
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=7
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=8
This one is just a ripoff of something a Google engineer did a long time ago, and has been part of the Mountain View tour for years:
http://design.yahoo.com/project.php?pid=9
The artists from yHaus were very talented, but their relevance to Yahoo amounted to supercool projections at Brickhouse parties. And that may be all that they were asked to do. Some companies treat innovation as a core part of the business, and others treat it as a P.R. exercise.
So for all we know, the situation might be better for startups after a Microsoft-Yahoo merger.
Google's acquisitions tend to have some unique technology. Yahoo's acquisitions have mostly been innovators with media and audiences. Does anyone know if there's a pattern with Microsoft? Microsoft has said they want to acquire a bunch of startups.
This one is a bit more personal and rather bitter: "An Engineer's View of Venture Capitalists". http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/careers/careerstemplate.jsp?Art...
This guy's main experience was in the 1980s, so it doesn't take into account technical people who got rich in the 90s boom and then went into VC. So things may have somewhat improved, in that you might find VCs who really grok your idea. Nevertheless, that doesn't address the mismatch of incentives.