684 karma · joined March 16, 2021
Funny how no one's doing that amidst all the concerns and outcries expressed online.
Hopefully this means the clogged up job market will stop being the clown circus it is now.
My parents pushed me hard to do piano when I was around 10-12. After a year that went pretty well I was starting to get lazy and put very little work and investment into preparing for the next lesson. They still had me play piano a full year until they eventually gave up and bitterly told me what a waste my resignation felt to them.
20 years later, I got back to playing piano, and I can't thank my parent enough for having me to continue playing in my teenage years. Because it only took me a few month to be able to play pretty advanced piano sheets compared to some of my relatives who are struggling with the basics starting it in their adulthood.
Same for maths. I feel that a lot of people like the author of this blog post are being extremely misdirected thinking math can and should be taught in a fun or amusing manner every time.
Sure, a lot of topics in Maths can be made more digestible by "gameification" to help younglings develop an intuition. But a very big part of Maths actually requires you to sit down and painstakingly crunch down the numbers/equations, memorize and learn when to apply the correct methods to solve some problems. And even though this part can feel fun and engaging after a while, you can't expect children to exhibit such interest right of the bat without having them first struggle with the classics.
Kids don't know better. Your role as a parent is to navigate along the fine line of forcing your kid to get good exposure to the (boring) activities we adults value and letting him enjoy what he enjoys. Only in doing that will your kid open up to the world and grow up into a functional human being.
Maybe all of those are clues that parts of the human subconscious mind operate pretty close to the principles behind diffusion models.
Where's my medal?
The burger was advertised as having two beef patty but the combined height, and hence volume of the two patties lying on top of one another was that of a single beef patty that you could buy in supermarket.
It deserves all the praises it gets.
Hard to keep a straight face reading that headline with that image burned in my mind.
It filters people into:
- those who don't manage time efficiently by investing too much energy on a problem.
- those who did cut the corner and as a result got an edge with a few more questions solved
- the genius ones, who solved everything, in whatever order
If the objective of a test is classifying candidates and time management is one of the metric considered, then this kind of testing pattern absolutely makes sense.
I was one of those who never cut corners and just focused on the problem at hand until failure, and now that I am working and need to get things done I wished my teachers trained me that skill.
Where do you draw the limit? Because you could justify being a forever renter about anything with your logic.
Being a forever renter is being dependent on the whim of those who lend you "your" stuff. It's only natural that many people do not want that kind of lifestyle.
After energy, material will be the most pressing issue.
If so, someone should do an analysis of how much politicians pocketed since then.
So.. It's okay if I record private conversation from high ranking states officials as long as I don't harm their reputation with it?
It's okay if I stole state intelligence as long as I don't harm my country with it?