HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

kirevmaco

57 karma · joined May 24, 2022

submissionscomments
kirevmaco··on Miyazaki's 'The Boy and the Heron' makes clear the world is a fragile place
I thought Spirited Away (made in 2001) was awful, so much so that I didn't watch anything Miyazaki made after that for years.

I tried The Wind Rises (made in 2013), also found it terrible.

However, before those two films, I had seen several Studio Ghibli's earlier movies and found them pretty good. I thought Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (pre-Ghibli but the same group of people, with director Miyazaki) was absolutely amazing. So my impression is that their earlier films are much better than their newer works.

kirevmaco··on What in the Ethereum application ecosystem excites me
There is a solution called DECO: https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=zWTx1iQOCDM

Backup video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWTx1iQOCDM

Original paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00938

kirevmaco··on What in the Ethereum application ecosystem excites me
There are many Invidious mirrors other than snopyta.org, here you can get the video link for any of them: https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=lMHaQGB1Wdc

I posted a youtube.com link as well.

kirevmaco··on What in the Ethereum application ecosystem excites me
Sergey Nazarov. Here's a recent talk he gave: https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=lMHaQGB1Wdc

In case the above doesn't work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMHaQGB1Wdc

kirevmaco··on Is this the end of crypto?
> It violates all the laws around SWIFT, at the international level, so its illegal under these laws.

But SWIFT itself is working with a "crypto" project:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/smallbusiness/swift-is-partn...

kirevmaco··on “I’m not that smart”
I'm convinced that a large part of this kind of thing is related to personality.

People's ability to get "in the zone" depends on if the level of presentation fits them. I remember in AP Chemistry, some kids just thrived on the rote memorization nature of the whole course. They did great. Some of us found it nonsensical that we had to memorize so much without explanation but we still managed to push through and get good grades. The people who did better weren't "smarter," they just never cared to ask any bigger questions about the material. I'm sure that lack of curiosity helped them to succeed in standard careers.

A person who was "smart enough" to do cutting edge theoretical research might get lucky and have a personality that fits with having a more standard life. Someone who isn't "smart enough" might be very interested in certain problems and push through to finding the answers. Someone who is "smart enough" to do that and doesn't like bureaucracy might drop out of grad school, or even undergrad.

kirevmaco··on SAT score distributions in Michigan
My point was that if you aren't willing to memorize stuff before you understand it, you often do worse in school.
kirevmaco··on SAT score distributions in Michigan
It's just testing and rewarding people who studied for the stupid test, that's all. It also rewards conformist personalities.

It reminds me of undergrad calculus, where you had to memorize how to do dozens of types of integrals. You're not supposed to ask "what does dx mean?" Asking those types of questions will give you a worse grade.

I remember back when I was supposed to "study" for this thing. I asked "if it's an aptitude test, how does it make sense to study for it?" No one could give me a good answer so I decided it was stupid and never studied for it. I thought it was disgusting that so many people were paying for services, books, etc. to specifically prepare for the test even though the whole pretense of the thing is that you're not supposed to be able to do that.

On the other hand, I loved a lot of the AP stuff (chemistry, physics, calculus) since you were rewarded based on understanding the actual content of a subject, a system that made sense. But it's a good thing I didn't think to ask what "dx" meant back then, otherwise I would have probably gotten a worse score.

kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
The Final Cut of the movie ruins the original look of the film. I'm amazed more people haven't commented on this. For example, compare the shot of the outside of Chew's lab:

Theatrical and Director's Cut versions: http://www.metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/br_dc_chew.jpg

Final Cut version: http://www.metabunker.dk/wp-content/uploads/br_fc_chew.jpg

See [1] and [2] for more.

[1] http://www.metabunker.dk/?p=1220

[2] http://www.metabunker.dk/?p=1258

kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
Thanks for posting that, it was hilarious. I'll definitely re-watch the part where they're quoting him directly again when I need a good laugh.

I wouldn't say he misunderstood his creation, I would rather say that he didn't care about the source material and made something different, with themes that weren't really thought through too well. I agree that the sum of the visions amalgamated is better than the vision of the director in this case.

kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
I agree with everything in your comment, including about AI. The last 30 minutes of that movie amazed me but I didn't like much of what came before that.
kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
I saw 2049 when it came out. I didn't like the original film much but of course was still curious about the sequel since I liked the original novel.

One problem I have with both these movies is that the whole "memories" thing doesn't have anything to do with the point the original novel was making. The main point of the original novel is that the replicants are fake human beings which are not only deplorable due to their lack of empathy but are also rather dangerous, and that real human beings will likely become dehumanized ourselves in our eventual efforts to eradicate them. I'm paraphrasing Dick in that last sentence but you can hear the more full version in this interview: https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=3d7XMnmPgUk

Anyway, I agree that 2049 has more of a plot than the original, but I lost most of my interest in the movie as soon as I realized that the main character was a replicant (which unfortunately happened pretty early on). Great cinematography though.

kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
Thanks for sharing your opinion. Probably you could tell from the tone of my comment, but I don't like the movie the way it is. I agree with you that the movie and the book work well together but I wish the movie worked as a standalone piece of art.

I think Kubrick and Clarke could have perhaps found a compromise. For example, I remember liking the ending part of the movie "A.I. Artificial Intelligence" by Spielberg which had a similar situation to the last sequence in 2001. I don't recall if that movie had any explicit explanation of what the beings at the end were but it was pretty clear who they were and what they were doing from the way the movie handled things.

kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
Thanks for bringing this up. Arthur C. Clarke was devastated at how the movie removed most of the explanations of what was going on, and walked out of the movie during the intermission:

"Without consulting or confronting his co-creator, Kubrick cut a huge amount of Arthur’s voice-over explanation during the final edit... As it turned out, Arthur did not get to see the completed film until the US private premiere. He was shocked by the transformation. Almost every element of explanation had been removed. Reams of voice-over narration had been cut. Far from being a pseudo-documentary, the film was now elusive, ambiguous and thoroughly unclear. Close to tears, he left at the intermission..."

(full article: https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2017/01/close-tears-he-...)

kirevmaco··on ‘Blade Runner’ at 40
"The main difference between what Ridley views this all in terms of and what I view it all in terms of is as follows. To me, the replicants (or androids, if you will) are deplorable because [inaudible] they are cold, they are selfish, they are heartless, they are completely self-centered, they have no empathy, they don't care about what happens to other creatures, and to me this is essentially a less-than-human entity for that reason. Now, Ridley said that he regarded them as supermen who couldn't fly. He said they are smarter than humans, they are stronger than humans, and they have faster reflexes than humans. Well, then I said 'well, gee Ridley, I mean, holy smokes, uh, golly,' and that was about all I could think of to say, you know. That's rather a great divergence, you see: we've gone from somebody who is a simulation of the authentic human to somebody who is literally superior to the authentic human. So we've now flipped all the cards on the table, you see, when we do that: in other words, all the cards that were up are now down and all the ones that were down are now up. And I was at a loss at that point, you know, to respond, I mean. I said, 'okay, now the theme of the book is that Rick Deckard is dehumanized in his job of tracking down the replicants and killing them, that in other words he winds up essentially like they are.' And Ridley said that he regarded that as an intellectual idea and he was not interested in making an esoteric film."

-- Philip K. Dick, interview with Paul M. Sammon (https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=3d7XMnmPgUk starting at 19:10)

kirevmaco··on I'm a skilled open-source maintainer, but I can't interview due to my disability
I also have Generalized Anxiety Disorder but don't have the other diagnoses you have, so please take what I have to say with a grain of salt. I really sympathize with what you wrote. My GAD was getting worse (feeling a rise in anxiety just from typing those words) and I eventually got it together to start seeing a therapist. It has helped quite a bit and I wish I had started seeing someone earlier. My appointments are in-person but when I was looking around, I found that a lot of therapists offer their services online. Perhaps you could find an option where the person was okay with your video being turned off to make it easier for you to talk.

I do hope you find a better job that fits with your conditions and I don't mean to minimize your efforts in that direction.