440 karma · joined June 21, 2022
On the other hand, just like with my own ideas, there's very little concrete evidence that they're correct. It looks like the author has been very careful about wording and avoids saying directly "there exists an implementation of these ideas that seems to be working well enough to expect it to scale".
The point is that we do know some things about the universe and, given what we do know, we think the probability is high. So we're obviously missing something but we don't know what.
The thing that makes the Fermi Paradox so interesting is that every resolution is either interesting or implies something interesting.
[1] https://kinder.rice.edu/sites/g/files/bxs4896/files/images/U...
Not sure if that's possible or if it violates any HN policies about how links are displayed, apologies if it's a silly/useless suggestion.
Edit: Not sure how popularis eth.limo w.r.t. to HN submissions, but the full domain should probably be displayed for any eth.limo submission.
As another comment suggested, I think it's the crowds and the commercialism. It might as well have been erected inside Disney World. Maybe I'm insensitive, but it takes more than the literal/physical art (the building itself) to move me.
Edit: For example, just walking around the Gothic Quarter at night was a significantly more moving, cathartic, or "timeless" experience for me.
A few other examples:
- https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9GwT4_YRZdBf9nIUHs0zjrnUVl-KBNSM
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncd6q9uIEdw&list=PLND1JCRq8Vuh3f0P5qjrSdb5eC1ZfZwWJ
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycJEoqmQvwg&list=PLbN57C5Zdl6j_qJA-pARJnKsmROzPnO9V
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps8jOj7diA0&list=PL9D558D49CA734A02
Sometimes I wish there was a frontend for YouTube that only has these kind of long-form lecture series, but I've never found one. I think part of the reason why is that essential "quality" is somewhat ineffable.> We have several exciting new CodeWhisperer for command line features coming in 2024 including support for Linux
Many of the answers in this thread talk about skills where AI seems unlikely to have any direct sort of impact at all (like plumbing). In my opinion, that could easily end up being technically correct but exactly wrong in spirit (assuming the ultimate goal is to have a good job). It's somewhat likely that AI-augmented or AI-enabled professions become so ludicrously profitable that any other profession becomes barely livable.
Instead of trying to avoid AI it might make more sense to ride the wave. Dive right into some industry that's undergoing upheaval, work for AI-powered startups, learn about the technology, and meet the future head-on.
I don't want to sound too "gung ho", I'm a software engineer who feels like my profession will be radically different in less than 10 years and I'm genuinely worried about staying relevant. But I think "staying relevant" is probably a better strategy than trying to get out of way.
Back when OpenAI still supported raw text completion with text-davinci-003 I spent some time experimenting with tiny prompt-embedded DSLs. The results were very, very, interesting IMO. In a lot of ways, text-davinci-003 with embedded functions still feels to me like the "smartest" language model I've ever interacted with.
I'm not sure how close we are to "superintelligence" but for baseline general intelligence we very well could have already made the prerequisite technological breakthroughs.
a = 10
b = a
a = 11
print(b) // 11
?The returns seem to be diminishing after ~6 weeks, but the first 2-3 weeks were the least friction I've ever encountered learning basically any new topic. It was kind of wild, I don't remember getting stuck even a single time, it was just super high-density progress, non-stop.
More generally, the situation where "I have a good amount of generic knowledge, so I know what I want, but I don't have the specific knowledge I need" seems to be a sweet spot for ChatGPT.
Why is the following timeline counterfactual (as far as I know) for basically all household appliances:
1. it was invented
2. it was commercialized
3. some decades of varying modes of specialization, advancement, innovation
4. reach technological maturity/saturation
5. open source designs with idiot-proof manuals emerge
6. everyone uses the open source versions
7. maybe a freelancer market emerges
8. it's no longer commercially viable
9. it becomes a near-zero-cost improvement on the baseline human condition
10. focus on new technology
The hopeful view (IMO) is that we're just at a point historically where things like washing machines and refrigerators are still at step 4 and people like me are starting to wonder why we're not further down the road? In 10-20 years maybe we'll be at 6 or 7?The cynical view (IMO) is that the capitalist system operates by pulling a bait and switch on the average consumer. As technology becomes commercially viable, we use the slack it creates to pump everyone full of skittles and pretty little liars and then sell refrigerator-television-vending-machine appliances until the Decadent Society collapses under its own weight.
Maybe a more moderate view (IMO) is that it's naive to think that everyone could possibly have the time or desire to maintain their own refrigerators? FWIW My take on this particular view is that we should be trying to develop a society where it's not naive, where the average human stands on top of centuries of innovation rather than cocooned inside of it.
/idk
Every deployed process receives exactly 3 environment variables, NONCE, TAGS and CONFIG_DB_PARAMS. Every process is bootstrapped in the same way:
1. Initialize config db client.
2. config = db.fetchConfig(tags)
3. Use NONCE to signal config changes if needed.
Of course there's some environments where this Just Won't Work. I'm wondering if there are some very serious issues with this approach in a "standard" web application environment. It seems so straightforward but I've literally never seen it done before, so I feel like I'm missing something. One summer evening drunk to hell
I stood there nearly lifeless
An old man in the corner sang
Where the water lilies grow
And on the jukebox johnny sang
About a thing called love
And its how are you kid and whats your name
And how would you bloody know?
In blood and death neath a screaming sky
I lay down on the ground
And the arms and legs of other men
Were scattered all around
Some cursed, some prayed, some prayed then cursed
Then prayed and bled some more
And the only thing that I could see
Was a pair of brown eyes that was looking at me
But when we got back, labeled parts one to three
There was no pair of brown eyes waiting for me
And a rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
For a pair of brown eyes
I looked at him he looked at me
All I could do was hate him
While Ray and Philomena sang
Of my elusive dream
I saw the streams, the rolling hills
Where his brown eyes were waiting
And I thought about a pair of brown eyes
That waited once for me
So drunk to hell I left the place
Sometimes crawling sometimes walking
A hungry sound came across the breeze
So I gave the walls a talking
And I heard the sounds of long ago
From the old canal
And the birds were whistling in the trees
Where the wind was gently laughing
And a rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
A rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
And a rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
For a pair of brown eyes
For a pair of brown eyes
And a rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
And a rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
And a rovin, a rovin, a rovin I'll go
For a pair of brown eyes
For a pair of brown eyes