283 karma · joined September 19, 2011
How do you find yours? Or do they find you?
bad.horse
bad.horse
bad.horse
he.rides.across.the.nation
the.thoroughbred.of.sin
he.got.the.application
that.you.just.sent.in
it.needs.evaluation
so.let.the.games.begin
a.heinous.crime
a.show.of.force
a.murder.would.be.nice.of.course
2. because somebody there wants to fix a problem
3. because somebody there wants to help other people
4. because somebody there wants to wave their org's flag everywhere this good news goes
5. because somebody there wants to make the world a better place
Maybe my difficulty lies in my perceived demand quantities versus postings I find.
With every HN Whos Hiring thread, I tell myself I need to write a tool to filter the posts based on buzz words, because scanning hundreds of the job openings for "security", "penetration", and the like is a major pain.
Loosing this rock or our star essentially equals the extinction of our species.
A couple of the longer radio form labels are cut off when I view from Firefox mobile
Suggestions for a purely subjective read?
The law firm has to pay for the data collection, the disk space to store the data, the transmission of data back and forth (investigator found something good, buys external HD, ships it via the mail), the data analysis, the investigation and reporting, and then sometimes the expert witness.
Sometimes, the law firm does not know what they're looking for, in other words, there is no smoking gun piece of data. Sometimes, the goal is to find something, anything, that would hint, point, or prove a goal.
What this means is that a retainer can either be here is 10hours worth of analysis/investigation to find the email we know was sent that contains this particular text. They do not plan on the analysis and investigation to exceed that and usually the result is we found it/didn't find it and we did it in the time allotted or under the time.
It can also be, "we're looking for evidence that this type of event has occurred". This is where the billed-hours start stacking up. Its hard enough digging through other people's emails, documents, and pictures looking for something, let alone digging without having something in particular to look for.
The point is, I believe that they, the law firms, want to, and need to, bring this in house. This greatly improves the process. But now they need security, real security, because its not their data being stored, it is their client's client's data and so forth. It becomes very sensitive.
They need infrastructure. They need to be able to forensically acquire data. Forensically store data. Forensically analyse data. Forensically share data. The infrastructure needs to be fast, easy, and effecient. We're seeing 6TB hard drives now... shares of much, much larger size. And they do not want to be storing their client's data in someone else's cloud.
Then they either need technicians and investigators or the ability to hire and grant access to their data on their network to the tech/investigator. They need technicians to provide solutions to the inevitable problems run into (i.e. how can I acquire each of the 2 drives in this FusionDrive raid and return to the lab and build the raid on something other than osX?) And they need investigators experienced at honing in on relevant data while digging through vast troves of data.
But no, I didn't add a page for him ...
Why my phone is unable to be a terminal to all my other machines is beyond me.
I should have 1 hard drive and 1 "computer", and 1 desktop. Every other machine should be a window to this desktop.
At least... in my dream world.
Source?
>arent sent instantly so an attacker could intercept or alter them
intercept where?
>Most attackers ... generate plenty of logs
Source?
>They can implement FSS and remote logging.
Point is, thus far they have not, and their first choice was not what the author views as more secure.
Seems to me, the need to be in control is enough motivation for these acts... without ever thinking that someone will have to build a Chinese amazon