"Ideal" isn't one thing. Allowing for personal customizations while following closely the standards make the base for implementing many "ideal flavors" of browsing experience.
517 karma · joined December 24, 2014
"Ideal" isn't one thing. Allowing for personal customizations while following closely the standards make the base for implementing many "ideal flavors" of browsing experience.
Connecting experiences, both positive and negative, and not losing the enthusiasm in the process is key to creativity.
Yes, you can replace CSP with Rx style libraries. It's just a different kind of learning curve.
Personally I prefer CSP, as channels are a more primitive approach to writing concurrent applications.
CSP is like a library and Bacon/Rx are like frameworks.
To answer your question straight, the reason the return of the Parthenon marbles matters, is morality. [4]
One cannot appreciate the significance of such creations to the fullest when they are taken out of context.
[1] http://www.parthenonuk.com/ [2] http://www.parthenoninternational.org/ [3] http://www.marblesreunited.org.uk/ [4] http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/12/23/the-british-...
But the point is, you need a build process when building a complex application aimed for production. You should be able to code at least a couple of npm scripts to do what you want, in case you are too bored to code a complete build process yourself.
But truth be told, if you CANNOT code a build process yourself, maybe you shouldn't be writing complex front-end applications in the first place.
You don't need to learn new terminology and configuration styles every time a new hot tool comes around. That's not your purpose, and surely it's not educational or mind expanding.
Maybe you should know the data before you blame a man. How about some charts and numbers from December 2014: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11283931/Nine-c...
The experience contained quality, responsiveness, stability as well as productivity enhancements. Hadn't missed Windows and Linux at all.
The experience remained perfect as the OS was gradually getting updates up to 10.6.8, the latest Snow Leopard version and the hard disk drive was changed to a solid state drive.
At that time I bought a MacBook Pro 13" with an i5 processor, and was introduced to Lion.
Believe it or not, I used my older MacBook more. It "felt" much more solid and responsive. Well at some point I gave it away, and was stuck with the Pro model.
As the OS updates where coming along, things were expected to get only better, just like I had previously experienced. But no! I'm currently using the latest Yosemite, and hate it when I notice tiny buggy things happening.. [ for example, try to disable the transparency in accessibility features, and get clunky black corner edges around the volume box as you adjust the volume up/down ]
As I became a more experienced programmer, I realized that good software is perfect software. Thus anything I notice that's not right (and doesn't get fixed when it's a known issue) is a hint for a lot more bugs that I might never get to experience. So essentially I feel like I've lost the stability and security feelings that used to keep me close to the Mac OS.
I really miss Snow Leopard, and hate the path Apple is following. I could bitch about their phones too but that would be more derailing.
PS: I wish there was an image out there of Mac OS 10.6.8 I haven't got a spare Apple machine to boot 10.6.7, update it to 10.6.8 and create a bootable disk for my MacBook Pro
Does anyone know if such an image exist, or perhaps can create it?