67 karma · joined February 5, 2009
After searching the Adobe forums and finding many users with the same problem, it seemed pretty obvious that Adobe just didn't know what the solution was.
Edit: found the relevant paragraph in the below mentioned Adobe blog:
"In CS3, there were some serious problems that customers faced and the time it took to resolve those issues in customer support made the initial experience with CS3 painful for some customers."
Painful? Oh yes...
What could possibly go wrong?
I ask because if you applied for a Sysadmin (or somesuch) position, I can see your lack of usage of Google products as fairly irrelevant. But if you were going for some sort of product development post, I can see why your interviewer might be somewhat uninterested in you.
I honestly cannot see any benefit for the end user from this restriction.
I think the opposite is true - "hardened hackers" may judge the TLD less than the general public.
Eg, I run a couple of small websites, and I know that .com is a matter of routing, and says little about the intention of my website. However, a casual user might see .com as more of a directory than a routing issue.
A few years ago I had a couple of people try and convince me that .org was reserved for non-profit organisations. While that might be the intended usage, it certainly isn't mandatory.
However, the potential competition is probably a good thing.