It's not your car anymore, so obviously you don't get to drive it.
376 karma · joined April 3, 2024
It's not your car anymore, so obviously you don't get to drive it.
what exactly were the rivian engineers thinking?
It's selective definancialization, and I love it. Same reason why buying tax foreclosures is such a great bargain: you don't have to compete with bank-financed buyers!
Most, possibly all states in the US will refuse to register a LNG conversion. Only the vehicles designed for that fuel from the start (like transit busses) are allowed.
They're just reselling google searches. With maybe 1% salted in from elsewhere for deniability.
> I’ve been short this nonsense for a decade,
...this nonsense = deep learning? I mean the current research wave is only just barely 10 years old and its financial/investable effects definitely less than 10 years old....
Or is "this nonsense" something else? Can you short Sam Altman the individual? takemymoney.jpeg I will chug that ice-nine kool-aid.
> LeCun woke up the other day and chose violence on X.
maybe just a link?
Well duh. Because it's the only value you're allowed to collect from retail customers without having to deal with either chargebacks or kyc.
We've deliberately made every other form of micropayment infeasible. It shouldn't be surprising that the only one left is insanely popular.
This phrase has no place in security research.
Project Ortega did it to an entire gigabit ethernet controller for the princely sum of zero dollars:
https://media.ccc.de/v/37c3-11781-adventures_in_reverse_engi...
https://wiki.raptorcs.com/wiki/Project_Ortega
> Binary BL31 contains some unknown code to get HDMI-RX PHY access working.
That doesn't sound like DDR training to me. Maybe now you see the problem?
For which baseband chip, specifically?
I mean this would be great, but I have a very hard time believing any baseband vendor gave you enough documentation to achieve that -- especially not without an OSS-prohibitive NDA. Would love to be wrong about that. It happened once, but that was back when Atheros was an independent company -- before they were Qualcommized.
Also, aren't all the wifi 6 baseband firmwares cryptographically signed? Best case it'll be as "open source" as Tivo was.
We've also reported mac leaks to vendors
That's good, but I don't think the whack-a-mole approach inspires much confidence. There have been so many of these problems that at this point we really need to take the car keys away from the drunkard and have the baseband chip and the MAC-bearing eeprom be separate devices which can only communicate via the CPU. Or just have the CPU derive the MAC from the CPU's own serial number. Or maybe just not have hardware MAC addresses at all.
That should be "blob which does stuff, including DDR training, at EL3".
That blob certainly does DDR training. Maybe it does other stuff. But all of it is done at EL3.
> In decreasing order of preference
"Warning! Diagram is not drawn to scale."
We've been getting these "almost there" announcements quarterly for multiple years at this point.
Just so people don't get confused, there is a huge world of difference between these two chips. They are not in the same category.
Rockchip RK3399 is 100% blobless. You even control the EL3 Trustzone Secure World! This is True Root.
Rockchip RK3588 still needs blobs in EL3, the highest privilege level. We've been hearing rumors for years now about "oh they'll open source it next month for sure" and it.... just. never. happens. Please stop spreading this rumor. Source or GTFO, Rockchip.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13839540
As of 2017 the authors of the paper above found MAC leaks in a shocking 96% of all android phones. And the remaining 4% aren't proven to be leak-free -- they simply hadn't noticed any leaks by the time they wrote the paper.
Unless you have fully open-source firmware on your baseband, like ath9k_htc, there's really no way to prevent this leakage. Or even be sure if it's happening.
https://wiki.debian.org/ath9k_htc/open_firmware
With open source baseband firmware you can guarantee that the baseband never even has access to the hardware MAC address. You can even reflash the MAC address eeprom (on every boot if you like!)
Sorry but it's true.
... and coretx's "nobody wants to peer with an idiot" is clearly not working here. These networks are still being peered with.
Maybe the regulators should start by regulating only international peering.
Well there's your problem, right there.
I'm really failing to see the distinction here.
Big tech will simply declare that phones aren't "general purpose computers". There is no reasonable endgame here in which: (a) this is enforced against cellphones and (b) this is not enforced against game consoles and (c) the EU doesn't end up looking completely ridiculous and arbitrary.
I'm betting that they cave on (b). It's the least painful option. The EU is going to have to enforce this against game consoles in order to be taken seriously.
It's like that scene at the end of Sneakers: "they just don't want to share with the other children..."
... noticed that it doesn't even define "indigenous"