467 karma · joined January 26, 2021
In fact the really bad spammers were already re-using prompts/templates, think of how many of those recipe novellas shared the same beats. "It was my favorite childhood comfort food", "Cooked with my grandma", blah blah blah
The original quote does that as well and I only reversed it to give the perspective of increative people :)
You might not be angry but you're using pretty malicious language to assign intent to the ad that doesn't seem present to me.
Project not making progress => senior gets involved => project making progress. Or senior gets involved and some architecture decision gets changed to alleviate some risk.
If the senior is doing this but its a visibility problem, then it may suck but they also need to self-advocate if the manager isn't proactively keeping track of their team(like they are supposed to be getting paid to).
I think a conservative estimate of link shorteners usage is that 99% of cases are used by bad actors, and if they would all die out my life would be a lot easier. But, every week it seems some new one pops up and theres a new wave of spam to deal with.
At least thanks to this post I can add a new one to the filters before a wave of spam, so yay?
This shouldn't be surprising though. Cars don't need heating or cooling or sewage or a roof or ...
Obviously nothing is perfect but it seems disingenuous to claim they're not designed for poor people to be able to complete them.
Honestly this is the reason I generally ignore these types of video essays, the people who make them generally have the most lazy criticisms that always end up pointing to the same boogeymen(VC, capitalism, US, etc.)
Yeah, but a charitable interpretation is that this is the female perspective and anxieties on AI porn/relationships/intimacy.
I'm sure there have been articles that focus on the male exploitation(emotionally, economically, etc.) these services do without mentioning the female body image issues they may exacerbate.
That seems unlikely when Microsoft is already investing so much in VSCode.
That said its likely a bug and nothing nefarious. Not to diminish that this is a really severe issue that you should raise to customer support, who likely has ways of cancelling for you.
The conclusion is drawn because presumably someone thinks they output enough value to continue paying them for their work. That person might be wrong, and maybe some PE firm or consultants will come through and cull the chaff to capture the lost expenses but the person themselves doing the work probably doesn't have the full perspective.