117 karma · joined May 23, 2013
July 13, 2012
A few of us kicked and shouted about this when this was proposed. If you'd like an example of how this is being abused, El Reg has a good article from 2009: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/24/ripa_jfl/It makes me feel angry and powerless.
"You can enjoy your life right now. You just need to spend less money on shit that you don’t need."
True, I don't need a house or to go travelling but my life would be poorer had I not invested in that shit.
Seriously Ars? You don't feel it's a little ironic to be raking through his communications like this?
Work samples are a way better indication of candidate quality than phone interviews. If the interviewer is sensible and has the flexibility to deal with it then they would definitely prefer you to show them your coding chops than ask you a bunch of technical questions. Many employers won't have the luxury of being able to spend someone's time reviewing your code though, or if they're big enough, will likely have a bunch of HR hoops to jump through.
If they're small and smart though, it's definitely worth a shot. Phone interviews are horrible for both ends. Beyond the real basics I think it's better to avoid them.
I'm not from the US so I'm not really sure about what the situation is with filibusters but it seems to me to be a loophole that needs fixing, or a symptom of some underlying system which needs fixing. Is anyone pushing for reform right now? It's great that this time it was used to a positive end but couldn't it just as easily be abused to cut in the other direction?
The Roman republic had some ideas about dealing with this with dictators appointed to "get the matter done". They were usually called upon when they were at war or facing rebellion. The dictator was vested with absolute power. He could pass any law or make any change to the Roman constitution. Once the matter had been done, he was immune to prosecution for anything done as dictator. It was an effective way for Rome to be free during peacetime and powerful during wars.
The thing is that when there's constantly a matter to be done that the power creep is never repealed.
[1]http://infowars.net/articles/september2007/050907Merkel.htm
[2]http://www.dw.de/german-chancellor-merkel-rebuffed-on-terror...
I've put up with some horrific jobs paying miserable money in some of the most uninspiring industrial parks you could imagine. I've taken work in dingy Victorian offices so cold that I've had to program through thick gloves. I've accepted commutes taking up to three hours and incorporating four different kinds of transport. More than once I've spent 18 hours on Saturday and Sunday circulating my CV to every job opening and recruiter even slightly relevant to web development.
Reverse interviews? People clamouring to have coffee with me? Beer constantly close to hand?? These are unheard of things. Conditions are definitely better for me now but my skills certainly don't mark me out as a celebrity. Maybe the financial bubble of the dot-com era has been replaced by a cultural bubble, one that I'm definitely not part of.
The title's really misleading though, this is more about why bold photos can be nice. I'm undecided on if it detracts from the text or if it's giving you the kind of visual impact you get from imaginative book covers. It would be really interesting to see larger collections on the site, I can see this being a really great way for people to discover authors they're unfamiliar with. A strikingly presented collection of short stories from an established author could serve as a good introduction into their work.
[1]https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.or... [2]http://readwrite.com/2013/05/07/blookist-blog-book-site-all-...
The analogy with the furniture is particularly misleading. Would you pay half as much for a chair that occasionally falls over? That takes a long time to get repaired because each of the legs is tightly coupled to one another? I'd rather pay double for the reliable version.
I've worked with a lot of code bases in the past where the developers have had a resentment towards new methodologies and saw people who tried to use new ideas as just trying to show off. It's a disheartening experience to want to use such fashionable concepts as 'objects' only to be told that the way things are done is procedural programming with SQL queries nested in markup like it's 2000 again. In my experience it's been because they've not wanted to invest in learning new things. That's not a good ethos for a programmer. Let's not promote it.
This reluctance to provide any substantive reference often results in references just being "yes this person worked here from this date to this other date".