316 karma · joined May 24, 2018
* pptx-grep - find text across multiple powerpoints, yield file/slide no and text excerpt of match
* pptx-dump - dumps extended info about a powerpoint, such as number of slides, applied master slides, used fonts etc.
* pptx-lint - allows to define validation rules for pptx based on content and/or formatting. E.g. presentation must not contain word "TBD", all text must be formatted in Arial etc.
But i will use the money to hire cleaning ladies or baby sitters -> more spare time than control group.
I've found it easier to use a spreadsheet. Sheet 1 contains the csv export to which i constantly append, sheet 2 the hierarchical acoount structure: an account name like "expenses: groceries:walmart" is followed by a regex that matches the expense description on sheet 1 for that account (walmart). On sheet 1 I have an "detected Account" column, into which a formula outputs the detected account based in the regexes.
Sumif formulas sum up the totals per account. Since no compilation step is necessary, rule changes are picked up much faster
Same purchase from amazon? Difficult, because you have two layers of indirection: checking account > credit card > amazon > it equipment.
Currently testing a new spreadsheet approach to deal with such scenarios, but not easy.
It starts with the lack of a common terminology. For tool A a "booking" might be a reservation e.g. of a dock at a warehouse. For tool B the same word means a movement of goods between two accounts.
In terms of data integration things have gotten A LOT worse since EDIFACT is de facto deprecated. Every carrier in the parcel business is cooking their own API, but with insufficient means. I've come across things like Polish endpoint names/error messages or country organisations of big Parcel couriers using different APIs.
IMHO the EU has to step in here because integration costs skyrocket. They forced cellphone manufacturers to use USB-Cs for charging, why can't they force carriers to use a common API?
I've greatly improved the "retrieval interval" of my phone since I've put it in a mint-green case instead of the standard black one. Same goes for my bluetooth headphone case, on which I applied reflective stickers.
Another trick is to group related objects. My office key card is in the cover of my work smart phone, so I have to look out for one item less each morning.
This is when I stopped reading
And again, a "non-regrettable" termination can also apply when the employee quit.
No. Every leaver is classified as a regrettable/non-regrettable case - this was a part of my last exit interview when I quit the job."non regrettable" just means you have very low chances of being hired by the company again.
They were know for doing cashier drills in the pre-barcode age: you had to sum up a shopping cart filled with certain products and report the sum plus time needed. Even now cash desk time per customer is measured - with crazy outcomes, e.g. AlDi cashiers putting groceries in the shopping bag for elderly people so that the dont block the queue too long.
Then the perfectly qualified PMs start from square one again.
IMHO it's an essential skill for a PM to familiarize him/herself with a new domain in short time. It also offers cross-pollination / the chance to do things different. Imagine Steve Jobs coming from a pure IT background instead of liberal arts / calligraphy -> Apple wouldn't have been so different any more.
If your product targets customers outside of the IT department, it's a whole different picture.