28 karma · joined March 10, 2009
If you choose not to use public WiFi because you can't "trust" it, then you now need to stop using your private WiFi too (until your systems get appropriate patches).
They're big on ensuring you've applied for the correct export licence from the USA (because that's where the distribution is technically made from), even if you're based outside the USA.
(Google just make you say you have, but Apple actually want to see the approval doc)
"How do you check disk usage. How do you trouble shoot a high disk usage issue"
which is fine, until someone's done something similar to the next bit of advice - i.e. deleted some "old", large files that were still open by the application.
Better: compare filesystem usage (with df), against disk space used (with du), to deduce that there's an open file that has been unlinked. Then use lsof (whatever Sun say about pfiles or about dtrace, lsof is an essential tool) to look for processes with open files that have large offsets.
And, when deleting large files, check whether they're open, and truncate them before deleting them if you're not sure.
(note to another poster - ain't nothing wrong with Solaris! But I'm not really sure what interviewer might ask questions about the OSI 7 layer model, these days, and I agree that there's a real odd jumble of scripting snippets in there: best advice to anyone wanting to improve that side of their systems administration skills, is to read a copy of Unix Power tools.)
http://www.teener.com/firewire_FAQ.html#Why_the_4-pin_connec...
(No word on what he thinks of the FW800 connector.)
I think it is important to know when to use a quick shell script, and when to solve the problem with some Perl (or even some C.) Sometimes it is quicker to throw together a shell script, with a bit of sed, awk, or some simple for loops, automating the command line you just manually ran a moment ago; sometimes it's best to solve the problem by switching to some Perl.
(and big, fancy yachts are always moored somewhere sunny, off the coast. So no problem there.)
[1. Or other non-tech person that you can watch web-browsing]
So if they can't get it right, for a limited scope of live music events, it is clearly as tough to get right as others say it is.
It's not likely that I'm going to see a banner advert on a page and immediately click on the link and respond to it. It interrupts whatever I'm actually doing - i.e. reading the content. But I might well remember having seen the advert later, and that might change my future plans.
(Here's an idea for free - make it easy for me to find the adverts I've already been shown. When I'm reading a physical newspaper or magazine I can flick back to the advert, or riffle through to find it again. Unless an advertiser is doing saturation advertising across an entire ad network one day, it's hard for me to do the same online.)
That, and the fact that the company seems to be struggling to get sales.
See the two pictures in this (quickly googled) discussion, for a clear illustration - http://forum.expatica.com/print.html&client=printer&...
But perhaps others are more fan-worshipping.
Apple's implementation could have avoided linking directories - by creating new directories each time but always linking the files inside them - though I suspect that they decided it would be far quicker to replicate entire trees if you knew nothing in them had changed.
(and let's not even start on what the Daily Fail and other vocal competitors will say.)
I tried once, with my then phone's FM radio, to listen to my usual BBC station on my 25 minute commute train journey. I gave up (too many tunnels, bridges, cuttings, with poor or no signal), and went back to my MP3s. I certainly wouldn't want to try TV!