The only reason not to do so is --- AI is not reliable.
7,530 karma · joined February 21, 2020
The only reason not to do so is --- AI is not reliable.
Most states have laws against altering state issued IDs. This includes obstructing the info on them in any way.
Nvidia "invests" in companies up and down the AI Infrastructure chain because it leads to sales of more Nvidia GPUs.
In effect, Nvidia is buying a portion of it's own product.
You don't have to be a financial genius to grasp the fact that this can't continue indefinitely --- just like any ponzi scheme.
In other words, it is another oxymoron.
This fact is an innate part of their training data.
Something that is technically impossible for the average end user to verify.
In other words, there is a big gaping hole in this ridiculous exercise.
The part that is missing --- a big chunk of these "earnings" are really driven by debt. Debt that is often not (yet) being reflected on corporate balance sheets.
https://techstartups.com/2026/07/23/five-big-tech-giants-hav...
Economists at the Bank for International Settlements recently described this financing approach as “shadow borrowing,” referring to capital raised through structures that avoid immediate recognition as debt under existing accounting rules.
And that driving blind can be hazardous --- to the driver and anyone else in the vicinity.
Also, can it use a network share for storage without corruption with multiple users --- aka a primary motivation to use MS Exchange.
"Never interrupt an enemy while he is making a mistake."
- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
This is just standard operating procedure. Remember --- "Don't be Evil".
Tech will capture lots of money by putting lots of people out of work.
But people without jobs means fewer "consumers" to buy all the products built with the shiny new AI.
It's capitalism run amuck and it puts the entire economy at risk. Basically, tech is building a rope that will ultimately lead to hanging itself along with the rest of the economy.
Nvidia is currently "investing" billions in the companies that buy and support it's products up and down the AI stack. And at the same time, Nvidia is "investing" directly in itself with plans to buyback hundreds of billions of it's own stock.
But as you might suspect, this "circular financing" can't continue indefinitely --- just like with any Ponzi scheme
Will this include Chinese models?
If not, then it will be ineffective and serve no real purpose except to try and exclude cheaper models from the USA.
Their not so secret strategy for owning the AI market --- low cost power.
The good news, "The lion's share of AI spend is still going towards U.S. models"
The bad news, the US frontier AI companies are cash burning machines. And it looks increasing likely that they may never be profitable. US vendors are essentially serving as advertisers and unwitting promoters of cheap Chinese AI.
https://github.com/rochus-keller/Are-we-fast-yet/blob/main/F...
Isn't this the *opposite* of "privacy"?
I believe that the only way AI can be truly trustworthy is for it to be open source and run locally --- possibly behind a filtering firewall.
Does anyone really want their private, personal data to be used against them?
These companies were built on privacy invasion and I see no reason to believe their AI won't be an extension of this.
1) The code isn't as "optimized" as it could be.
2) The talent pool is limited --- chicken or egg issue.
It has been this way for a very long time so I don't see it changing.
Or maybe Forrest Gump, "Stupid is as stupid does".
In other words, Swami and company are starting to realize they f'ed up.