I think I'm in favor of this work, but it is alarming.
3,201 karma · joined May 22, 2012
Previously worked on Augmented Reality (founded Mira)and did VC at Nvidia
josephpmay AT gmail.com
I think I'm in favor of this work, but it is alarming.
Statistically, assault by Uber drivers is really rare, but enough people take enough rides that I know multiple people who have had these experiences. Uber needs to have super-strict privacy controls and auditing on this, but it'll make a lot of people, especially women, feel more comfortable with taking Ubers.
CLT is stiffer than plywood, and the construction techniques are closer to steel/concrete, so it'll likely need reinforcement or dampering. Traditional wood buildings these days are designed to flex in earthquakes.
But it hasn't been extensively tested for seismic properties yet
I've seen him working on this project (Delta and the AltStore) for four or five years. It's a project he's passionate about, and he's building it for himself, not to try and make money. (In fact, he's turned down offers from startups and top tech companies to work on this). More than almost anyone else I know, Riley embodies the classical hacker ethos. I believe partway through the project he decided to make this open source, so he then went back and re-factored a lot of the code to make it easier to learn from.
Here's the repository, btw: https://github.com/rileytestut/AltStore
I personally hate this trend, but almost everybody's doing it these days
Yes, there are newer standards, specifically FHIR (OAuth authenticated API). But why switch over to FHIR when HL7v2 works really well? Everybody in the medical industry supports this standard, and it’s super easy to work with once you know what you’re doing. It’s also arguably more interoperable than FHIR, because the sending and receiving parties don’t need to fully agree on the spec (like they must for an API). For HL7 messages, there’s a layer that sits in between called an “interface engine” that can modify messages, which opens up more capability with less development and coordination.
The best way to reduce costs is likely to get more people to use the service, which will result in more trips being shared with more passengers. They could also look at usage data and consider developing fixed, regular routes which if done right will congregate more people into fewer vehicles
2) I'm surprised the article didn't mention Africa at all. A lot of Chinese industrialists are investing in Africa, and I suspect that Chinese-style supply chains have a good chance of developing there. If I was looking for a country to for long-term manufacturing strategies right now, I'd be taking a hard look at African countries.
This is certainly a good business/investment opportunity. If your algorithms are any good you'll make a lot of money, and you'll help your customers make money.
My problem with Lofty is that it is bad for society.
Fundamentally, this is gentrification-as-a-service. You're driving additional demand to neighborhoods at inflection points, and if it works well it's definitely going to accelerate displacement. It is true that Blackrock et al already do this and likely have similar in-house algorithms, but this will widen the market and make things worse. I'm not completely against gentrification, especially when there's development that increases market supply- and when done right that can actually decrease displacement. (an example you're probably familiar with is the USC Village. Despite the criticism it gets, it removed thousands of student renters from the South Central LA market which likely resulted in downward pressure on prices) But housing speculation like this drives up prices and only hurts poor and minority communities.
To Jerry and Max: did you consider the ethical implications when deciding to start this? I completely see the angle that you're democratizing access to an investment asset that currently mainly benefits wealthy institutional investors. I imagine, though, that a lot of people are going to see your team of young almost-all-white males and paint you as everything that's wrong with tech, and you should consider to what degree that assumption represents the truth.
Notion has made it much easier to keep track of and refer back to my old notes. For example, I used to draft emails in an unorganized OneNote notebook. If I needed to find an old draft, I'd have to use search and hope that I remembered the right keywords. With Notion, I make all of my email drafts a subpage of an email page, which makes them much easier to find.