453 karma · joined December 15, 2011
Website: jonnyscholes.com
Email: mail@jonnyscholes.com
I haven't put it up on my website yet (and proper documentation is still coming) so unfortunately the best I can do is show you an Instagram link:
https://www.instagram.com/p/C98t1hlzDLx/?igsh=MWxuOHlsY2lvdT...
Not exactly functional, but fun . Artwork aside it's quite interesting to see your life broken into all its little bits. Provides a new perspective (apparently, there are a lot more teacups in my life than I notice).
Whilst being post-dotcom, where a lot of the internet was worked out technically, culturally platforms were still only just starting out. It was before social network UIs all looked the same and there was a play book for creating a network for X. Small communities were thriving and they all still had control of their ecosystems. Internet "mediums" were still in a state of flux on all fronts.
It was the start of "the masses" coming online and creating profiles - but they came online through things like MSN spaces, MySpace and geocities. Which were a lot less sanitized than today's equivalents. Everyday people experimented with their pages the same way teenages do with their bedroom walls. They looked awful, but the medium was alive.
Both of these made me feel more like making for the sake of making was less linked to ego. And overall every community I was part of was still innovating on the medium as much as their niche (be it art, netsec, photography, local history etc).
The parallels I'm thinking of in particular are both artists rushing to the platforms and trying digital art for the first time (admittedly many driven by $$). Meanwhile community leaders are having to deal with new technical, cultural and governance issues - many of which are novel issues imo.
The communities I came across were for the most part making for the sake of making. And plenty of them were building new things and experimenting.
Everyone's experience is relative. Perhaps my experiences are rose tinted by nostalgia.
All that is to say, I observe aspects of some NFT (or crypto) communities feel the same to me - new mediums, new challenges and a new excitement around them.
* However I do still think that there is a huge NFT/crypto bubble and there is cataclysmic amounts fud.
Although perhaps paradoxically, I suspect the barrier to entry is part of this.
Full disclosure: I hold a small amount of tezos.
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotl...
Sure, Standard on the face of it seems simple technologically, and compared to many other things it is. But it's value lies in completely removing long winded and often unnecessary conversations within teams about code style.
Standard represents a standard style of writing JS that has gained widespread support (similar to Airbnb's linter config). It's value is that a team can adopt broadly sane conventions then never think about it again - which leaves those dev cycles for shipping features. Without widespread use, Standard would be just another linter config - but large parts of the JS ecosystem (regardless of what people think of JS) have adopted it and as a result it has saved the world a million conversations that "didn't need to happen".
If you care enough about style to not pick their choices, you're free not to use it. But for a lot of us we just want a broadly accepted opinion so we can focus on features.
And as it turns out, maintaining a style guide for how to write JS for the masses takes quite a lot of work. Not writing code necessarily, but considering and replying to all the feedback on that style.
Not for or against the funding project - but within the JS ecosystem Standard has meant many hundreds of hours that might have been spent biked shedding, have been spent shipping features.
Standard has been genuinely useful to myself and pretty much every other JS developer I know. And whilst I'm in no position to speak to weather I'm junior or not I know a lot of the most experienced programmers in the JS ecosystem reach for Standard so they can focus on more important matters.
It's not JS that has such opinions enshrined in law, Python for example has pep8.
2.4 just got it's first release candidate and has a bunch of enhancements aimed at first time users so it's a good time to give it a go!
I think there could be a niche version or this service for that industry - esp if the "bosses" in this service were vetted in a way an artist could know they understand the industry. I could see some mid-high level artists paying for this (esp if social/marketing were slapped on top). Might need to be localised somewhat though...
As a complete aside if anyone running the business is reading this I found the centered text for everything inc body copy pretty hard to read. Solid website overall though.
Which as someone who had been asked to fix wrong information in Google search results dozens of times over the years is a god send!
Edit: Turns out we're both from Aus :party:
A good way to bring a client round is to explain that the time saved on making IE11 pixel perfect is better spent adding features elsewhere.
(All our websites work in IE11 - they're just allowed to be "visually different from the approved designs" - it's a pretty good compromise for many clients!)